{"id":490,"date":"2025-03-11T01:21:38","date_gmt":"2025-03-11T01:21:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/6-14-ultimate-geotechnical-strength-of-drilled-shafts-subjected-to-axial-compressive-loads\/"},"modified":"2026-03-16T14:09:52","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T14:09:52","slug":"6-14-ultimate-geotechnical-strength-of-drilled-shafts-subjected-to-axial-compressive-loads","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/6-14-ultimate-geotechnical-strength-of-drilled-shafts-subjected-to-axial-compressive-loads\/","title":{"raw":"6.14 Ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts subjected to axial compressive loads","rendered":"6.14 Ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts subjected to axial compressive loads"},"content":{"raw":"The general concept for estimating the collapse load of driven piles under drained and undrained loading conditions using analytical formulas (<em>\u03b1<\/em>- and <em>\u03b2<\/em>-Method) can be applied for the estimation of the collapse compressive load of drilled shafts too. However, the factors employed in the calculation of the skin friction resistance and the end bearing resistance with the <em>\u03b1<\/em>-Method and the <em>\u03b2<\/em>-Method may have to be modified, to account for the soil disturbance during excavation of drilled shafts.\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>6.14.1 Estimating the ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts with the \u03b1-Method<\/h2>\nFor the estimation of the adhesion factor <em>a<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> for drilled shafts, the formula proposed by O\u2019Neil and Reese (1999) and depicted in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr.png\">Figure 6.41<\/a> should be used for drilled shafts. Observe that it provides significantly more conservative values compared to the corresponding <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/02\/6.18-hr.png\">Figure 6.18<\/a> for driven piles.\n\nIn addition, the bearing capacity factor <em>\u039d<\/em><sub>cp<\/sub> employed in the estimation of the end-bearing resistance under undrained loading conditions with Eq. 6.9 is replaced by the factor <em>\u039d*<\/em><sub>cp<\/sub>:\n\n<strong>(6.68)<\/strong> [latex]N_{cp}^ * = 1.33\\left[ {\\ln \\left( {{I_r}} \\right) + 1} \\right][\/latex]\n\nwhere <em>I<sub>r<\/sub><\/em> is the <em>rigidity index<\/em> of the soil, equal to <em>I<sub>r<\/sub> = G\/S<sub>u<\/sub> = E<sub>u<\/sub>\/<\/em>3<em>S<sub>u<\/sub><\/em>. When undrained triaxial tests are not available for the estimation of the shear <em>G<\/em> or of the undrained Young modulus of the soil <em>E<sub>u<\/sub><\/em>, one may obtain the values from Table 6.8, using linear interpolation for intermediate values.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_489\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"400\"]<img class=\"wp-image-488 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440.png\" alt=\"Chart providing the variation of the adhesion factor au with the dimensionless undrained strength Su\/pa. The plotted line is described with the following function: au = 0.55 for Su\/pa <1.5, au = 0.55-0.1[(Su\/pa)-1.5] for 1.5<Su\/pa<2.5\" width=\"400\" height=\"321\"> Figure 6.41. Estimation of the adhesion factor for drilled shafts according to O\u2019Neill and Reese (1999).[\/caption]\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"0\"><caption><strong>Table 6.8.<\/strong> Rigidity index <em>I<sub>r <\/sub><\/em>and bearing capacity factor <em>N*<sub>cp<\/sub><\/em> correlation with the undrained shear strength (Reese <em>et al.<\/em> 2006).<\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><strong>Undrained shear strength, <em>S<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> (kPa)<\/strong><\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><strong><em>I<sub>r<\/sub><\/em><\/strong><\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><strong><em>N*<sub>cp<\/sub><\/em><\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">25<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">50<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">6.53<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">50<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">150<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">7.99<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">100<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">250<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">8.67<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">200<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">300<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">8.91<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>6.14.2 Estimating the ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts with the <em>\u03b2<\/em>-Method<\/h2>\nGenerally, the formulas for driven piles can be applied as-is for drilled shafts too. Reese <em>et al.<\/em> (2006) proposed specific formulas for estimating the skin friction resistance and end-bearing resistance of drilled shafts installed in coarse-grained soils on the basis of SPT test data. More specifically, the factor <em>\u03b2<\/em> for medium-to-dense sands with uncorrected SPT blow count <em>\u039d<\/em><sub>60 <\/sub>&gt; 15 can be estimated as (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/03\/6.42-hr.png\">Figure 6.42<\/a>):\n\n<strong>(6.69)<\/strong> [latex]\\beta = 1.5 - 0.245\\sqrt z {\\rm{ \\:and\\: }}0.25 \\le \\beta \\le 1.2[\/latex]\n\nwhile for loose-to-medium sands with uncorrected SPT blow count <em>\u039d<\/em><sub>60 <\/sub>&lt; 15:\n\n<strong>(6.70)<\/strong> [latex]\\beta = \\dfrac{{{N_{60}}}}{{15}}\\left[ {1.5 - 0.245\\sqrt z } \\right][\/latex]\n\nand for gravels:\n\n<strong>(6.71)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]\\beta = 2.0 - 0.25{z^{0.75}}{\\rm{ \\:and \\:}}0.25 \\le \\beta \\le 1.8[\/latex]\n\nwhere <em>z<\/em> is the depth measured from the ground surface. The skin friction resistance estimated with this method must be limited to <em>f<sub>sf<\/sub> = <\/em><em>\u03b2\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z0<\/sub><\/em> <em>&lt; <\/em>200 kPa, arguably a quite high value if we consider Table 6.4 and the fact that construction of drilled shafts will result in release of stresses in sand. The author would recommend considering a more conservative cap on the skin friction resistance calculated with the above formulas, in line with Table 6.4.\n\nAs far as the end-bearing resistance <em>q<sub>bf<\/sub><\/em> is concerned, Reese<em> et al.<\/em> (2006) recommend the following formula:\n\n<strong>(6.72a)<\/strong> [latex]L \\ge 10{\\rm{ \\:m \\:use \\:}}{q_{bf}} = 57.5{N_{60}} \\le 2900{\\rm{ \\:kPa}}[\/latex]\n\n<strong>(6.72b)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]L &lt; 10{\\rm{ \\:m \\:use \\:}}{q_{bf}} = 57.5\\left( {\\dfrac{L}{{10}}} \\right){N_{60}} \\le 290L{\\rm{ \\:kPa}}[\/latex]\n\nIt is reminded that the end-bearing resistance (units: force) of closed-end piles of diameter <em>D<\/em> is calculated from the end-bearing resistance (units: stress) as:\n\n<strong>(6.73)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{Q_b} = {q_{bf}}\\pi {\\left( {\\dfrac{D}{2}} \\right)^2}[\/latex]\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_489\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"350\"]<img class=\"wp-image-489 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/6.42-hr-e1743553302295.png\" alt=\"Graph presenting the variation of the factor \u03b2 with depth z. Four curves are plotted, corresponding to sand (N60>15), sand (N60=10), sand (N60=5) and gravels.\" width=\"350\" height=\"481\"> Figure 6.42. Estimation of<em> \u03b2<\/em> factor for drilled shafts in coarse-grained soils according to Reese et al. (2006).[\/caption]","rendered":"<p>The general concept for estimating the collapse load of driven piles under drained and undrained loading conditions using analytical formulas (<em>\u03b1<\/em>&#8211; and <em>\u03b2<\/em>-Method) can be applied for the estimation of the collapse compressive load of drilled shafts too. However, the factors employed in the calculation of the skin friction resistance and the end bearing resistance with the <em>\u03b1<\/em>-Method and the <em>\u03b2<\/em>-Method may have to be modified, to account for the soil disturbance during excavation of drilled shafts.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>6.14.1 Estimating the ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts with the \u03b1-Method<\/h2>\n<p>For the estimation of the adhesion factor <em>a<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> for drilled shafts, the formula proposed by O\u2019Neil and Reese (1999) and depicted in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr.png\">Figure 6.41<\/a> should be used for drilled shafts. Observe that it provides significantly more conservative values compared to the corresponding <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/02\/6.18-hr.png\">Figure 6.18<\/a> for driven piles.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the bearing capacity factor <em>\u039d<\/em><sub>cp<\/sub> employed in the estimation of the end-bearing resistance under undrained loading conditions with Eq. 6.9 is replaced by the factor <em>\u039d*<\/em><sub>cp<\/sub>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.68)<\/strong> [latex]N_{cp}^ * = 1.33\\left[ {\\ln \\left( {{I_r}} \\right) + 1} \\right][\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>where <em>I<sub>r<\/sub><\/em> is the <em>rigidity index<\/em> of the soil, equal to <em>I<sub>r<\/sub> = G\/S<sub>u<\/sub> = E<sub>u<\/sub>\/<\/em>3<em>S<sub>u<\/sub><\/em>. When undrained triaxial tests are not available for the estimation of the shear <em>G<\/em> or of the undrained Young modulus of the soil <em>E<sub>u<\/sub><\/em>, one may obtain the values from Table 6.8, using linear interpolation for intermediate values.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_489\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-489\" style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-488 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440.png\" alt=\"Chart providing the variation of the adhesion factor au with the dimensionless undrained strength Su\/pa. The plotted line is described with the following function: au = 0.55 for Su\/pa &lt;1.5, au = 0.55-0.1[(Su\/pa)-1.5] for 1.5&lt;Su\/pa&lt;2.5\" width=\"400\" height=\"321\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440.png 400w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440-300x241.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440-65x52.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440-225x181.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/03\/6.41-hr-e1743553282440-350x281.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-489\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.41. Estimation of the adhesion factor for drilled shafts according to O\u2019Neill and Reese (1999).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<caption><strong>Table 6.8.<\/strong> Rigidity index <em>I<sub>r <\/sub><\/em>and bearing capacity factor <em>N*<sub>cp<\/sub><\/em> correlation with the undrained shear strength (Reese <em>et al.<\/em> 2006).<\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><strong>Undrained shear strength, <em>S<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> (kPa)<\/strong><\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><strong><em>I<sub>r<\/sub><\/em><\/strong><\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><strong><em>N*<sub>cp<\/sub><\/em><\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">25<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">50<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">6.53<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">50<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">150<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">7.99<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">100<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">250<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">8.67<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">200<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">300<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">8.91<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>6.14.2 Estimating the ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts with the <em>\u03b2<\/em>-Method<\/h2>\n<p>Generally, the formulas for driven piles can be applied as-is for drilled shafts too. Reese <em>et al.<\/em> (2006) proposed specific formulas for estimating the skin friction resistance and end-bearing resistance of drilled shafts installed in coarse-grained soils on the basis of SPT test data. More specifically, the factor <em>\u03b2<\/em> for medium-to-dense sands with uncorrected SPT blow count <em>\u039d<\/em><sub>60 <\/sub>&gt; 15 can be estimated as (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/03\/6.42-hr.png\">Figure 6.42<\/a>):<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.69)<\/strong> [latex]\\beta = 1.5 - 0.245\\sqrt z {\\rm{ \\:and\\: }}0.25 \\le \\beta \\le 1.2[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>while for loose-to-medium sands with uncorrected SPT blow count <em>\u039d<\/em><sub>60 <\/sub>&lt; 15:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.70)<\/strong> [latex]\\beta = \\dfrac{{{N_{60}}}}{{15}}\\left[ {1.5 - 0.245\\sqrt z } \\right][\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>and for gravels:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.71)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]\\beta = 2.0 - 0.25{z^{0.75}}{\\rm{ \\:and \\:}}0.25 \\le \\beta \\le 1.8[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>where <em>z<\/em> is the depth measured from the ground surface. The skin friction resistance estimated with this method must be limited to <em>f<sub>sf<\/sub> = <\/em><em>\u03b2\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z0<\/sub><\/em> <em>&lt; <\/em>200 kPa, arguably a quite high value if we consider Table 6.4 and the fact that construction of drilled shafts will result in release of stresses in sand. The author would recommend considering a more conservative cap on the skin friction resistance calculated with the above formulas, in line with Table 6.4.<\/p>\n<p>As far as the end-bearing resistance <em>q<sub>bf<\/sub><\/em> is concerned, Reese<em> et al.<\/em> (2006) recommend the following formula:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.72a)<\/strong> [latex]L \\ge 10{\\rm{ \\:m \\:use \\:}}{q_{bf}} = 57.5{N_{60}} \\le 2900{\\rm{ \\:kPa}}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.72b)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]L < 10{\\rm{ \\:m \\:use \\:}}{q_{bf}} = 57.5\\left( {\\dfrac{L}{{10}}} \\right){N_{60}} \\le 290L{\\rm{ \\:kPa}}[\/latex]\n\nIt is reminded that the end-bearing resistance (units: force) of closed-end piles of diameter <em>D<\/em> is calculated from the end-bearing resistance (units: stress) as:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(6.73)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{Q_b} = {q_{bf}}\\pi {\\left( {\\dfrac{D}{2}} \\right)^2}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_489\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-489\" style=\"width: 350px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"350\" height=\"481\" class=\"wp-image-489 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/6.42-hr-e1743553302295.png\" alt=\"image\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/6.42-hr-e1743553302295.png 350w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/6.42-hr-e1743553302295-218x300.png 218w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/6.42-hr-e1743553302295-65x89.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/6.42-hr-e1743553302295-225x309.png 225w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-489\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">15), sand (N60=10), sand (N60=5) and gravels.&#8221; width=&#8221;350&#8243; height=&#8221;481&#8243;&gt; Figure 6.42. Estimation of<em> \u03b2<\/em> factor for drilled shafts in coarse-grained soils according to Reese et al. (2006).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"menu_order":14,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"","pb_short_title":"6.14 Ultimate geotechnical strength of drilled shafts subjected to axial compressive loads","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-490","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":421,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":491,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/490\/revisions\/491"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/421"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/490\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=490"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=490"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}