{"id":241,"date":"2025-01-30T04:03:24","date_gmt":"2025-01-30T04:03:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/4-5-immediate-settlement-of-shallow-foundations\/"},"modified":"2026-03-16T13:59:31","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T13:59:31","slug":"4-5-immediate-settlement-of-shallow-foundations","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/4-5-immediate-settlement-of-shallow-foundations\/","title":{"raw":"4.5 Immediate settlement of shallow foundations","rendered":"4.5 Immediate settlement of shallow foundations"},"content":{"raw":"Elastic settlement of soil subjected to uniform, flexible loadings can be simply calculated as the sum of the volumetric strains <em>\u03b5<\/em><sub>vol<\/sub> along the thickness of the compressible layer, <em>\u0397<\/em>:\n\n<strong>(4.7)<\/strong> [latex]\\rho = \\int\\limits_0^{\\rm H} {{\\varepsilon _{vol}}dz}[\/latex]\n\nThe same basic concept applies for the estimation of settlement of shallow foundations. Nevertheless, we need to introduce some corrections in the above equation to account for the effect of the rigidity of the foundation, the embedment depth, and the shape of the footing, while appropriately considering drained or undrained conditions. These are discussed in the following paragraphs.\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>4.5.1 Effect of footing rigidity: Immediate settlement and contact stresses<\/h2>\nDistortion of soil due to the application of an external load or pressure depends on the rigidity of the loaded area, and the type of soil (fine-grained or coarse-grained) i.e., whether immediately after application of a loading the soil will behave as drained or undrained. In case of <em>rigid <\/em>footings (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10<\/a>), settlement is of course uniform. The distribution of contact stresses below the footing is, nevertheless, highly non-uniform. Assuming that soil behaves as elastic material, contact stresses at the outer edge of the footing (<em>x<\/em> = <em>B<\/em>\/2, <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10<\/a>) would become infinite:\n\n<strong>(4.8)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]\\Delta {\\sigma _z} = \\dfrac{{2{q_{ext}}}}{\\pi }\\dfrac{1}{{\\sqrt {1 - {{\\left( {\\dfrac{{2x}}{B}} \\right)}^2}} }}[\/latex]\n\nIn a real <em>fine-grained<\/em> soil however, they are limited by its shear strength. The drained Young\u2019s modulus <em>E\u2032 <\/em>of <em>coarse-grained <\/em>soils depends on the degree of confinement, and this affects the distribution of stress underneath a loaded area. The fact that the drained Young\u2019s modulus <em>E\u2032<\/em>\u00a0depends on the confining stress is mathematically expressed as:\n\n<strong>(4.9)<\/strong> [latex]E' = {E'_{ref}}{\\left( {\\dfrac{{p'}}{{{p_{ref}}}}} \\right)^m}[\/latex]\n\nwhere <em>p\u2032 <\/em>is the mean effective stress <em>p\u2032 <\/em>= (<em>\u03c3<\/em><em>\u2032<\/em><sub>1<\/sub><em>+<\/em><em>\u03c3<\/em><em>\u2032<\/em><sub>2<\/sub><em>+<\/em><em>\u03c3<\/em><em>\u2032<\/em><sub>3<\/sub>)\/3, <em>\u0395\u2032<\/em><em><sub>ref<\/sub><\/em> is the reference modulus value at a reference mean stress <em>p<sub>ref<\/sub><\/em>, while the exponent <em>m<\/em> is considered usually <em>m <\/em>= 0.5 for sands and <em>m <\/em>= 1.0 for clays. In other words, the Young\u2019s modulus is non-linear function of mean stress in sands. Near the outer edges, where confinement (i.e., the mean stress) is less compared to the centre of the footing, the stresses are lower (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10b<\/a>).\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_2430\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"600\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-233 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\" alt=\"The image on the left depicts a rigid footing on fine grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are infinite at the edges of the footing, and decrease towards to middle, where the minimum reaction stress develops. The image on the right depicts a rigid footing on coarse grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are zero at the edges of the footing, and increase towards to middle, where the maximum reaction stress develops.\" width=\"600\" height=\"255\"><\/a> Figure 4.10. Distribution of contact stresses below a rigid footing transferring uniform vertical pressure to (a) fine-grained and (b) coarse-grained soil.[\/caption]\n\nContact stress distribution under a <em>flexible<\/em> loaded area is uniform, but the settlement profile varies as soil surface is free to deform, depending again on whether soil is fine-grained or coarse-grained (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\">Figure 4.11<\/a>). The shape of the deformed surface in the case of saturated clay <em>(undrained loading)<\/em> will be concave upward (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\">Figure 4.11a<\/a>), as it is reasonable to assume a uniform value of <em>E<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> across the thickness of the compressible clay layer, as in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10a<\/a>. On the other hand, the shape of the deformed surface in the case of a coarse-grained material (<em>drained loading<\/em>) will be concave downward (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\">Figure 4.11b<\/a>). That is because the Young\u2019s modulus of sands <em>E\u2032<\/em> varies non-linearly with confining stress. As the latter are lower near the edge of the footing, compared to the stresses at its centre, the settlement developing near the edges will be higher than near the centre of the footing.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_2431\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"600\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-234 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\" alt=\"The image on the left depicts a flexible footing on fine grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are uniform, and concave upwards. The image on the right depicts a flexible footing on coarse grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are non-uniform, larger stresses develop towards the edges and lower stresses develop towards the middle. where the minimum reaction stress develops. The image on the right depicts a rigid footing on coarse grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are zero at the edges of the footing, and increase towards to middle, where the maximum reaction stress develops.\" width=\"600\" height=\"199\"><\/a> Figure 4.11. Distribution of contact stresses below a flexible footing transferring uniform vertical pressure to (a) fine-grained and (b) coarse-grained soil.[\/caption]\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>4.5.2 Effect of embedment depth<\/h2>\nThe pressure acting on the soil that will result in ground settlement is the <em>additional<\/em> pressure \u0394<em>q<sub>ext <\/sub><\/em>imposed at the level of the foundation, on top of the pre-existing geostatic vertical effective stress at this level, <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub>. Settlement due to the stress <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> has already taken place during soil deposition, before application of the loading.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_4107\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"400\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.12-replace-e1747992307531.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-4107 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.12-replace-e1747992307531.png\" alt=\"Schematic showing a footing embedded is soil with unit weight \u03b3 at depth Df and subjected to an external force Qext. For analysis purposes the footing is modelled as pressure qext applied at depth Df.\" width=\"400\" height=\"442\"><\/a> Figure 4.12. Effect of embedment depth.[\/caption]\n\nIf the foundation level is at the ground surface, and no other loads exist (e.g., preloading) then <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> = 0 and the additional pressure \u0394<em>q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> is equal to the pressure from the footing <em>q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> i.e., the applied force divided by the area of the footing <em>Q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em>\/(Area). But in the common case where the topsoil is excavated for the construction of the foundation level at depth <em>D<sub>f<\/sub><\/em> (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.12-replace-e1747992307531.png\">Figure 4.12<\/a>) and soil is unloaded, the pre-existing vertical effective stress <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> is equal to the geostatic stress at this level <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> = <em>\u03b3<\/em><em>D<sub>f<\/sub><\/em><sub>,<\/sub> where <em>\u03b3<\/em>\u00a0is the unit weight of the soil. In that case:\n\n<strong>(4.10)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]\\Delta {q_{ext}} = {q_{ext}} - \\gamma {D_f}[\/latex]\n\nBesides, embedment of a foundation will further reduce the expected settlement as:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Soil stiffness generally increases with depth. Foundation on a stiffer soil layer will of course result in less settlement.<\/li>\n \t<li>Normal stresses from the soil above the foundation level increase confinement.<\/li>\n \t<li>Part of the loading may be transferred through the side walls, as shear resistance can be mobilised at the soil-walls interface. Accommodation of part of the loading by side resistance reduces settlement (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.13-replace-e1747992335822.png\">Figure 4.13<\/a>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[caption id=\"attachment_4108\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"400\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.13-replace-e1747992335822.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-4108 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.13-replace-e1747992335822.png\" alt=\"Diagram illustrating the shear resistance developing at the wall of a foundation embedded in soil at depth Df.\" width=\"400\" height=\"280\"><\/a> Figure 4.13. Development of shear resistance at the soil-wall interface.[\/caption]\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>4.5.3 Drained or undrained soil response for calculating immediate settlements<\/h2>\nMethods for estimating settlement which are based on the theory of elasticity are often applied to predict settlement of structures founded on coarse-grained (sand, gravel) soils. We use such methods while considering the <em>drained<\/em> elastic parameters of soil i.e., the drained Young's modulus <em>E\u2032<\/em>\u00a0(also referred to as <em>compressibility modulus<\/em>, or <em>deformation modulus<\/em>) and the drained Poisson's ratio <em>v\u2032<\/em><em>. <\/em>As soil behaviour is actually non-linear, the appropriate value of the Young's modulus to be used with a method assuming linear elastic soil behaviour should take into account the stress levels that are expected to be applied in soil (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png\">Figure 4.14<\/a>). Of course it is prudent to design the foundation so that strains in the foundation soil under serviceability conditions remain low, therefore elasticity formulas should provide a relatively good approximation of soil behaviour <em>in situ<\/em>. Furthermore, one should keep in mind that the Young's modulus generally increases with depth, as it is a function of the mean stress level (see Section 4.5.1).\n\nFor fine grained soils, if the applied stress is sufficiently less than the yield stress of soil, immediate (short term) settlement should indeed be approximately linear elastic. In fact, the author could argue that good design practice requires designing any foundation or earthwork (embankment) so that the yield stress of soil (i.e., its preconsolidation stress, see Section 4.6.2) is not exceeded immediately after loading the foundation soil. In that case, we can apply methods for estimating settlements that are based on the theory of elasticity, while considering the <em>undrained<\/em> elastic parameters of the soil i.e., the undrained Young's modulus <em>E<\/em><sub>u<\/sub>, which can be estimated from triaxial undrained tests in soil samples (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\">Figure 4.15<\/a>) and the undrained Poisson's ratio <em>v<\/em><sub>u <\/sub><em>\u2248 0.5<\/em>, that satisfies the requirement for zero volume change during undrained loading<em>.<\/em> Remember that according to the theory of elasticity, the undrained Young's modulus, for deformation under constant volume, is related to the drained Young's modulus as:\n\n<strong>(4.11)<i>\u00a0<\/i><\/strong>[latex]{E_u} = \\dfrac{3}{{2\\left( {1 + v'} \\right)}}E'[\/latex]\n\nThe theory behind the above Eq. 4.11 is discussed in <a href=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/4-7-immediate-and-consolidation-deformations-underneath-shallow-foundations-imposing-3-d-loading-conditions-a-theory-of-elasticity-approach\/\">Chapter 4.7<\/a>.\n\n&nbsp;\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_2432\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"800\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-237 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png\" alt=\"The figure on the left presents two load-settlement curves of shallow foundations: One curve exhibits hardening, and the ultimate load is denoted as Qf. The other curve exhibits softening, and the ultimate load is denoted as Qc. The range of approximately linear elastic response, at low strains, is indicated. The figure on the right presents the softening stress-strain curve of a soil sample subjected to triaxial loading. The soil Young's modulus Es is defined as the inclination of the curve at low strains.\" width=\"800\" height=\"356\"><\/a> Figure 4.14. (a) Load-settlement curves of shallow foundations, and (b) Stress-strain soil response.[\/caption]\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_4110\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"400\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-238 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\" alt=\"Graph presenting the deviator stress-axial strain curve measured during a undrained triaxial compression test on a soil sample. The ultimate stress is denoted as 2Su. E_u^50 is defined as the secant modulus at deviator stress Su. It is noted that E_u^50=3G^50\" width=\"400\" height=\"313\"><\/a> Figure 4.15. Estimation of the undrained Young\u2019s modulus <em>E<sub>u<\/sub> <\/em>(at a stress level equal to half the failure stress) from triaxial compression tests.[\/caption]\n\nKeep also in mind that undrained loading under constant volume does not necessarily mean zero deformation, as it is the case of one-dimensional consolidation in the oedometer test. In two-dimensional problems, as the problem of predicting the immediate settlement of shallow footings, lateral soil heave is allowed to develop, and immediate settlement can occur under constant volume (see also <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.9-HR-e1743559331969.png\">Figure 4.9<\/a>). This is also depicted in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\">Figure 4.15<\/a>, where undrained triaxial loading of a soil sample results in axial, but also lateral strains.\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>4.5.4 Immediate settlement of arbitrarily-shaped rigid footings on homogeneous half-space<\/h2>\nThe immediate (elastic) settlement of rigid shallow footings of arbitrary shape can be estimated using the following expression by Gazetas <em>et al.<\/em> (1985), which is based on the assumption of linear elastic soil resting on a homogeneous half-space (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\">Figure 4.16<\/a>):\n\n<strong>(4.12)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{\\rho _e} = \\dfrac{{{Q_{ext}}}}{{{E_s}L}}\\left( {1 - \\nu _s^2} \\right){\\mu _s}{\\mu _{emb}}{\\mu _{wall}}[\/latex]\n\nwhere: <em>Q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> is the vertical load (units: force) acting on the footing under serviceability conditions; <em>E<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>E<sub>u <\/sub><\/em>if the foundation soil is fine-grained (undrained conditions), or <em>E<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>E\u2032<\/em>\u00a0if the foundation soil is coarse-grained (drained conditions). In that case Eq. 4.12 provides the total settlement; <em>v<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>v<sub>u<\/sub> \u2248 <\/em>0.5 if the foundation soil is fine-grained (undrained conditions), or <em>v<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>v\u2032 <\/em>if the foundation soil is coarse-grained (drained conditions); <em>L<\/em> is the half-length of the circumscribed rectangle.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_4111\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"600\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-239 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\" alt=\"Diagram illustrating a rigid foundation on an elastic half-space. The foundation is embedded at depth Df and is subjected to an external force Q_ext. The properties of the homogeneous half-space are Young's modulus Es and Poisson's ratio vs. A plan view of the foundation is used to define its width as 2B and its length as 2L. The base area is defined as A_b and the area of the soil in contact with the footing is defined as Aw.\" width=\"600\" height=\"528\"><\/a> Figure 4.16. Geometry to calculate settlement of rigid shallow footings (after Gazetas et al. 1986).[\/caption]\n\nMoreover, <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>s<\/sub> is a factor accounting for the shape of footing, equal to:\n\n<strong>(4.13)<\/strong> [latex]{\\mu _s} = 0.45{\\left( {\\dfrac{{{A_b}}}{{4{L^2}}}} \\right)^{ - 0.38}}[\/latex]\n\n<em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>emb<\/sub> is a factor accounting for the effect of embedment:\n\n<strong>(4.14)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{\\mu _{emb}} = 1 - 0.04\\dfrac{{{D_f}}}{B}\\left[ {1 + \\dfrac{4}{3}\\left( {\\dfrac{{{A_b}}}{{4{L^2}}}} \\right)} \\right][\/latex]\n\n<em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>wall<\/sub> is a factor accounting for the effect of wall friction:\n\n<strong>(4.15)<\/strong> [latex]{\\mu _{wall}} = 1 - 0.16{\\left( {\\dfrac{{{A_w}}}{{{A_b}}}} \\right)^{0.54}}[\/latex]\n\nThe parameters that appear in the above expressions are defined in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\">Figure 4.16<\/a>, while values of the ratio <em>A<sub>b<\/sub>\/<\/em>4<em>L<sup>2<\/sup><\/em> for common footing shapes are presented in Table 4.3.\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"0\"><caption><strong>Table 4.3.<\/strong> Values of <em>A<sub>b<\/sub>\/<\/em>4<em>L<sup>2<\/sup><\/em> for common footing shapes.<\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"width: 23.1536%;height: 15px;text-align: center\">Footing shape<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><em>A<sub>b<\/sub>\/<\/em>4<em>L<sup>2<\/sup><\/em><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">Square<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;height: 15px;text-align: center\">Rectangle<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;height: 15px;text-align: center\"><em>B\/L<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">Circular<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">0.785<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">Strip<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nThis method is valid for \u201cdeep\u201d homogeneous soil. In practice this means that the thickness of the surficial compressive layer should be larger than the influence depth of the load. If that is not the case, the method will result in (over)conservative settlement predictions, as discussed in <a href=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/example-4-8-the-importance-of-boundary-conditions\/\">Example 4.8<\/a>. In addition, it is the author\u2019s view that the factor accounting for the wall friction must be used with caution, as it is not at all certain that the interface\u2019s shear strength will be mobilised at the wall-soil interface under the serviceability load. It is therefore reasonable to assume that <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>wall<\/sub> = 1 i.e., no load is transferred through friction.\n\nNote that the method described above does not apply to strip footings, as it predicts infinite settlement. This is a consequence of assuming that the thickness of the compressible layer is infinite.\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>4.5.5 Immediate settlement of footings on fine-grained soil layer of limited thickness<\/h2>\nWhen the thickness of the compressible soil layer relatively to the dimensions of the foundation is relatively small, and the compressible soil is underlain by a practically incompressible layer, the method described in Section 4.5.4 will provide over-conservative settlement predictions. If the foundation soil is fine-grained, the immediate settlement of a flexible footing transferring pressure <em>q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> to a soil layer of finite thickness can be calculated according to Christian and Carrier (1978) as:\n\n<strong>(4.16)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{\\rho _e} = \\dfrac{{{q_{ext}}B}}{{{E_u}}}{\\mu _0}{\\mu _1}[\/latex]\n\nwhere <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>0<\/sub> accounts for the effect of embedment and <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>1 <\/sub>accounts for the thickness of the compressible layer relatively to the dimensions of the footing (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\">Figure 4.17<\/a>). In addition <em>B<\/em> is the width of the footing and <em>E<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> is the undrained Young\u2019s modulus of the fine-grained soil. Note that <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\">Figure 4.17<\/a> depicts values of <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>0<\/sub> and <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>1<\/sub> that correspond to Poisson\u2019s ratio <em>v<sub>u <\/sub><\/em>= 0.5, hence the above are valid only for undrained loading conditions.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_4112\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"1100\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-240 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\" alt=\"The figure on the top presents the variation of the factor \u03bc_0 with the embedment ratio Df\/B. The figure on the bottom presents the variation of the factor \u03bc_1 with the thickness ratio H\/B, for different values of L\/B ranging from circle to inf. An inset figure is used to define the width of the footing as B, the embedment depth as Df, and the thickness of the compressible layer measured from the embedment depth as H. The soil Poisson's ratio is v_u=0.5.\" width=\"1100\" height=\"928\"><\/a> Figure 4.17. Coefficients <em>\u03bc<sub>0<\/sub><\/em> and <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>1<\/sub> for Poisson\u2019s ratio <em>v<\/em><sub>u<\/sub>=0.5 (after Christian and Carrier 1978).[\/caption]","rendered":"<p>Elastic settlement of soil subjected to uniform, flexible loadings can be simply calculated as the sum of the volumetric strains <em>\u03b5<\/em><sub>vol<\/sub> along the thickness of the compressible layer, <em>\u0397<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.7)<\/strong> [latex]\\rho = \\int\\limits_0^{\\rm H} {{\\varepsilon _{vol}}dz}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>The same basic concept applies for the estimation of settlement of shallow foundations. Nevertheless, we need to introduce some corrections in the above equation to account for the effect of the rigidity of the foundation, the embedment depth, and the shape of the footing, while appropriately considering drained or undrained conditions. These are discussed in the following paragraphs.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>4.5.1 Effect of footing rigidity: Immediate settlement and contact stresses<\/h2>\n<p>Distortion of soil due to the application of an external load or pressure depends on the rigidity of the loaded area, and the type of soil (fine-grained or coarse-grained) i.e., whether immediately after application of a loading the soil will behave as drained or undrained. In case of <em>rigid <\/em>footings (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10<\/a>), settlement is of course uniform. The distribution of contact stresses below the footing is, nevertheless, highly non-uniform. Assuming that soil behaves as elastic material, contact stresses at the outer edge of the footing (<em>x<\/em> = <em>B<\/em>\/2, <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10<\/a>) would become infinite:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.8)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]\\Delta {\\sigma _z} = \\dfrac{{2{q_{ext}}}}{\\pi }\\dfrac{1}{{\\sqrt {1 - {{\\left( {\\dfrac{{2x}}{B}} \\right)}^2}} }}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>In a real <em>fine-grained<\/em> soil however, they are limited by its shear strength. The drained Young\u2019s modulus <em>E\u2032 <\/em>of <em>coarse-grained <\/em>soils depends on the degree of confinement, and this affects the distribution of stress underneath a loaded area. The fact that the drained Young\u2019s modulus <em>E\u2032<\/em>\u00a0depends on the confining stress is mathematically expressed as:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.9)<\/strong> [latex]E' = {E'_{ref}}{\\left( {\\dfrac{{p'}}{{{p_{ref}}}}} \\right)^m}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>where <em>p\u2032 <\/em>is the mean effective stress <em>p\u2032 <\/em>= (<em>\u03c3<\/em><em>\u2032<\/em><sub>1<\/sub><em>+<\/em><em>\u03c3<\/em><em>\u2032<\/em><sub>2<\/sub><em>+<\/em><em>\u03c3<\/em><em>\u2032<\/em><sub>3<\/sub>)\/3, <em>\u0395\u2032<\/em><em><sub>ref<\/sub><\/em> is the reference modulus value at a reference mean stress <em>p<sub>ref<\/sub><\/em>, while the exponent <em>m<\/em> is considered usually <em>m <\/em>= 0.5 for sands and <em>m <\/em>= 1.0 for clays. In other words, the Young\u2019s modulus is non-linear function of mean stress in sands. Near the outer edges, where confinement (i.e., the mean stress) is less compared to the centre of the footing, the stresses are lower (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10b<\/a>).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2430\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2430\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-233 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\" alt=\"The image on the left depicts a rigid footing on fine grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are infinite at the edges of the footing, and decrease towards to middle, where the minimum reaction stress develops. The image on the right depicts a rigid footing on coarse grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are zero at the edges of the footing, and increase towards to middle, where the maximum reaction stress develops.\" width=\"600\" height=\"255\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png 600w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655-300x128.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655-65x28.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655-225x96.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655-350x149.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2430\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.10. Distribution of contact stresses below a rigid footing transferring uniform vertical pressure to (a) fine-grained and (b) coarse-grained soil.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Contact stress distribution under a <em>flexible<\/em> loaded area is uniform, but the settlement profile varies as soil surface is free to deform, depending again on whether soil is fine-grained or coarse-grained (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\">Figure 4.11<\/a>). The shape of the deformed surface in the case of saturated clay <em>(undrained loading)<\/em> will be concave upward (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\">Figure 4.11a<\/a>), as it is reasonable to assume a uniform value of <em>E<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> across the thickness of the compressible clay layer, as in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.10-HR-e1743559354655.png\">Figure 4.10a<\/a>. On the other hand, the shape of the deformed surface in the case of a coarse-grained material (<em>drained loading<\/em>) will be concave downward (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\">Figure 4.11b<\/a>). That is because the Young\u2019s modulus of sands <em>E\u2032<\/em> varies non-linearly with confining stress. As the latter are lower near the edge of the footing, compared to the stresses at its centre, the settlement developing near the edges will be higher than near the centre of the footing.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2431\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2431\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-234 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png\" alt=\"The image on the left depicts a flexible footing on fine grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are uniform, and concave upwards. The image on the right depicts a flexible footing on coarse grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are non-uniform, larger stresses develop towards the edges and lower stresses develop towards the middle. where the minimum reaction stress develops. The image on the right depicts a rigid footing on coarse grained soil. The footing is subjected to uniform pressure qext. The reaction stresses are zero at the edges of the footing, and increase towards to middle, where the maximum reaction stress develops.\" width=\"600\" height=\"199\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506.png 600w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506-300x100.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506-65x22.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506-225x75.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.11-HR-e1743559369506-350x116.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2431\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.11. Distribution of contact stresses below a flexible footing transferring uniform vertical pressure to (a) fine-grained and (b) coarse-grained soil.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>4.5.2 Effect of embedment depth<\/h2>\n<p>The pressure acting on the soil that will result in ground settlement is the <em>additional<\/em> pressure \u0394<em>q<sub>ext <\/sub><\/em>imposed at the level of the foundation, on top of the pre-existing geostatic vertical effective stress at this level, <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub>. Settlement due to the stress <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> has already taken place during soil deposition, before application of the loading.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4107\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4107\" style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.12-replace-e1747992307531.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4107 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.12-replace-e1747992307531.png\" alt=\"Schematic showing a footing embedded is soil with unit weight \u03b3 at depth Df and subjected to an external force Qext. For analysis purposes the footing is modelled as pressure qext applied at depth Df.\" width=\"400\" height=\"442\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4107\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.12. Effect of embedment depth.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>If the foundation level is at the ground surface, and no other loads exist (e.g., preloading) then <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> = 0 and the additional pressure \u0394<em>q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> is equal to the pressure from the footing <em>q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> i.e., the applied force divided by the area of the footing <em>Q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em>\/(Area). But in the common case where the topsoil is excavated for the construction of the foundation level at depth <em>D<sub>f<\/sub><\/em> (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.12-replace-e1747992307531.png\">Figure 4.12<\/a>) and soil is unloaded, the pre-existing vertical effective stress <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> is equal to the geostatic stress at this level <em>\u03c3\u2032<\/em><em><sub>z<\/sub><\/em><sub>0<\/sub> = <em>\u03b3<\/em><em>D<sub>f<\/sub><\/em><sub>,<\/sub> where <em>\u03b3<\/em>\u00a0is the unit weight of the soil. In that case:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.10)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]\\Delta {q_{ext}} = {q_{ext}} - \\gamma {D_f}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>Besides, embedment of a foundation will further reduce the expected settlement as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Soil stiffness generally increases with depth. Foundation on a stiffer soil layer will of course result in less settlement.<\/li>\n<li>Normal stresses from the soil above the foundation level increase confinement.<\/li>\n<li>Part of the loading may be transferred through the side walls, as shear resistance can be mobilised at the soil-walls interface. Accommodation of part of the loading by side resistance reduces settlement (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.13-replace-e1747992335822.png\">Figure 4.13<\/a>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4108\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4108\" style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.13-replace-e1747992335822.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4108 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.13-replace-e1747992335822.png\" alt=\"Diagram illustrating the shear resistance developing at the wall of a foundation embedded in soil at depth Df.\" width=\"400\" height=\"280\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4108\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.13. Development of shear resistance at the soil-wall interface.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>4.5.3 Drained or undrained soil response for calculating immediate settlements<\/h2>\n<p>Methods for estimating settlement which are based on the theory of elasticity are often applied to predict settlement of structures founded on coarse-grained (sand, gravel) soils. We use such methods while considering the <em>drained<\/em> elastic parameters of soil i.e., the drained Young&#8217;s modulus <em>E\u2032<\/em>\u00a0(also referred to as <em>compressibility modulus<\/em>, or <em>deformation modulus<\/em>) and the drained Poisson&#8217;s ratio <em>v\u2032<\/em><em>. <\/em>As soil behaviour is actually non-linear, the appropriate value of the Young&#8217;s modulus to be used with a method assuming linear elastic soil behaviour should take into account the stress levels that are expected to be applied in soil (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png\">Figure 4.14<\/a>). Of course it is prudent to design the foundation so that strains in the foundation soil under serviceability conditions remain low, therefore elasticity formulas should provide a relatively good approximation of soil behaviour <em>in situ<\/em>. Furthermore, one should keep in mind that the Young&#8217;s modulus generally increases with depth, as it is a function of the mean stress level (see Section 4.5.1).<\/p>\n<p>For fine grained soils, if the applied stress is sufficiently less than the yield stress of soil, immediate (short term) settlement should indeed be approximately linear elastic. In fact, the author could argue that good design practice requires designing any foundation or earthwork (embankment) so that the yield stress of soil (i.e., its preconsolidation stress, see Section 4.6.2) is not exceeded immediately after loading the foundation soil. In that case, we can apply methods for estimating settlements that are based on the theory of elasticity, while considering the <em>undrained<\/em> elastic parameters of the soil i.e., the undrained Young&#8217;s modulus <em>E<\/em><sub>u<\/sub>, which can be estimated from triaxial undrained tests in soil samples (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\">Figure 4.15<\/a>) and the undrained Poisson&#8217;s ratio <em>v<\/em><sub>u <\/sub><em>\u2248 0.5<\/em>, that satisfies the requirement for zero volume change during undrained loading<em>.<\/em> Remember that according to the theory of elasticity, the undrained Young&#8217;s modulus, for deformation under constant volume, is related to the drained Young&#8217;s modulus as:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.11)<i>\u00a0<\/i><\/strong>[latex]{E_u} = \\dfrac{3}{{2\\left( {1 + v'} \\right)}}E'[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>The theory behind the above Eq. 4.11 is discussed in <a href=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/4-7-immediate-and-consolidation-deformations-underneath-shallow-foundations-imposing-3-d-loading-conditions-a-theory-of-elasticity-approach\/\">Chapter 4.7<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2432\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2432\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-237 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png\" alt=\"The figure on the left presents two load-settlement curves of shallow foundations: One curve exhibits hardening, and the ultimate load is denoted as Qf. The other curve exhibits softening, and the ultimate load is denoted as Qc. The range of approximately linear elastic response, at low strains, is indicated. The figure on the right presents the softening stress-strain curve of a soil sample subjected to triaxial loading. The soil Young's modulus Es is defined as the inclination of the curve at low strains.\" width=\"800\" height=\"356\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526.png 800w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526-300x134.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526-768x342.png 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526-65x29.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526-225x100.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.14-HR-e1743559407526-350x156.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2432\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.14. (a) Load-settlement curves of shallow foundations, and (b) Stress-strain soil response.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4110\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4110\" style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-238 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\" alt=\"Graph presenting the deviator stress-axial strain curve measured during a undrained triaxial compression test on a soil sample. The ultimate stress is denoted as 2Su. E_u^50 is defined as the secant modulus at deviator stress Su. It is noted that E_u^50=3G^50\" width=\"400\" height=\"313\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png 400w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665-300x235.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665-65x51.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665-225x176.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665-350x274.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4110\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.15. Estimation of the undrained Young\u2019s modulus <em>E<sub>u<\/sub> <\/em>(at a stress level equal to half the failure stress) from triaxial compression tests.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Keep also in mind that undrained loading under constant volume does not necessarily mean zero deformation, as it is the case of one-dimensional consolidation in the oedometer test. In two-dimensional problems, as the problem of predicting the immediate settlement of shallow footings, lateral soil heave is allowed to develop, and immediate settlement can occur under constant volume (see also <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.9-HR-e1743559331969.png\">Figure 4.9<\/a>). This is also depicted in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.15-replace-e1747992388665.png\">Figure 4.15<\/a>, where undrained triaxial loading of a soil sample results in axial, but also lateral strains.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>4.5.4 Immediate settlement of arbitrarily-shaped rigid footings on homogeneous half-space<\/h2>\n<p>The immediate (elastic) settlement of rigid shallow footings of arbitrary shape can be estimated using the following expression by Gazetas <em>et al.<\/em> (1985), which is based on the assumption of linear elastic soil resting on a homogeneous half-space (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\">Figure 4.16<\/a>):<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.12)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{\\rho _e} = \\dfrac{{{Q_{ext}}}}{{{E_s}L}}\\left( {1 - \\nu _s^2} \\right){\\mu _s}{\\mu _{emb}}{\\mu _{wall}}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>where: <em>Q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> is the vertical load (units: force) acting on the footing under serviceability conditions; <em>E<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>E<sub>u <\/sub><\/em>if the foundation soil is fine-grained (undrained conditions), or <em>E<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>E\u2032<\/em>\u00a0if the foundation soil is coarse-grained (drained conditions). In that case Eq. 4.12 provides the total settlement; <em>v<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>v<sub>u<\/sub> \u2248 <\/em>0.5 if the foundation soil is fine-grained (undrained conditions), or <em>v<sub>s<\/sub><\/em> = <em>v\u2032 <\/em>if the foundation soil is coarse-grained (drained conditions); <em>L<\/em> is the half-length of the circumscribed rectangle.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4111\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4111\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-239 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\" alt=\"Diagram illustrating a rigid foundation on an elastic half-space. The foundation is embedded at depth Df and is subjected to an external force Q_ext. The properties of the homogeneous half-space are Young's modulus Es and Poisson's ratio vs. A plan view of the foundation is used to define its width as 2B and its length as 2L. The base area is defined as A_b and the area of the soil in contact with the footing is defined as Aw.\" width=\"600\" height=\"528\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png 600w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736-300x264.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736-65x57.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736-225x198.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736-350x308.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4111\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.16. Geometry to calculate settlement of rigid shallow footings (after Gazetas et al. 1986).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Moreover, <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>s<\/sub> is a factor accounting for the shape of footing, equal to:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.13)<\/strong> [latex]{\\mu _s} = 0.45{\\left( {\\dfrac{{{A_b}}}{{4{L^2}}}} \\right)^{ - 0.38}}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p><em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>emb<\/sub> is a factor accounting for the effect of embedment:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.14)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{\\mu _{emb}} = 1 - 0.04\\dfrac{{{D_f}}}{B}\\left[ {1 + \\dfrac{4}{3}\\left( {\\dfrac{{{A_b}}}{{4{L^2}}}} \\right)} \\right][\/latex]<\/p>\n<p><em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>wall<\/sub> is a factor accounting for the effect of wall friction:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.15)<\/strong> [latex]{\\mu _{wall}} = 1 - 0.16{\\left( {\\dfrac{{{A_w}}}{{{A_b}}}} \\right)^{0.54}}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>The parameters that appear in the above expressions are defined in <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.16-replace-e1747992443736.png\">Figure 4.16<\/a>, while values of the ratio <em>A<sub>b<\/sub>\/<\/em>4<em>L<sup>2<\/sup><\/em> for common footing shapes are presented in Table 4.3.<\/p>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<caption><strong>Table 4.3.<\/strong> Values of <em>A<sub>b<\/sub>\/<\/em>4<em>L<sup>2<\/sup><\/em> for common footing shapes.<\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"width: 23.1536%;height: 15px;text-align: center\">Footing shape<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\"><em>A<sub>b<\/sub>\/<\/em>4<em>L<sup>2<\/sup><\/em><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">Square<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;height: 15px;text-align: center\">Rectangle<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;height: 15px;text-align: center\"><em>B\/L<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">Circular<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">0.785<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 23.1536%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">Strip<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.9074%;text-align: center;height: 15px\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This method is valid for \u201cdeep\u201d homogeneous soil. In practice this means that the thickness of the surficial compressive layer should be larger than the influence depth of the load. If that is not the case, the method will result in (over)conservative settlement predictions, as discussed in <a href=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/chapter\/example-4-8-the-importance-of-boundary-conditions\/\">Example 4.8<\/a>. In addition, it is the author\u2019s view that the factor accounting for the wall friction must be used with caution, as it is not at all certain that the interface\u2019s shear strength will be mobilised at the wall-soil interface under the serviceability load. It is therefore reasonable to assume that <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>wall<\/sub> = 1 i.e., no load is transferred through friction.<\/p>\n<p>Note that the method described above does not apply to strip footings, as it predicts infinite settlement. This is a consequence of assuming that the thickness of the compressible layer is infinite.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>4.5.5 Immediate settlement of footings on fine-grained soil layer of limited thickness<\/h2>\n<p>When the thickness of the compressible soil layer relatively to the dimensions of the foundation is relatively small, and the compressible soil is underlain by a practically incompressible layer, the method described in Section 4.5.4 will provide over-conservative settlement predictions. If the foundation soil is fine-grained, the immediate settlement of a flexible footing transferring pressure <em>q<sub>ext<\/sub><\/em> to a soil layer of finite thickness can be calculated according to Christian and Carrier (1978) as:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4.16)\u00a0<\/strong>[latex]{\\rho _e} = \\dfrac{{{q_{ext}}B}}{{{E_u}}}{\\mu _0}{\\mu _1}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>where <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>0<\/sub> accounts for the effect of embedment and <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>1 <\/sub>accounts for the thickness of the compressible layer relatively to the dimensions of the footing (<a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\">Figure 4.17<\/a>). In addition <em>B<\/em> is the width of the footing and <em>E<sub>u<\/sub><\/em> is the undrained Young\u2019s modulus of the fine-grained soil. Note that <a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\">Figure 4.17<\/a> depicts values of <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>0<\/sub> and <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>1<\/sub> that correspond to Poisson\u2019s ratio <em>v<sub>u <\/sub><\/em>= 0.5, hence the above are valid only for undrained loading conditions.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4112\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4112\" style=\"width: 1100px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/oercollective.caul.edu.au\/app\/uploads\/sites\/143\/2025\/01\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-240 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png\" alt=\"The figure on the top presents the variation of the factor \u03bc_0 with the embedment ratio Df\/B. The figure on the bottom presents the variation of the factor \u03bc_1 with the thickness ratio H\/B, for different values of L\/B ranging from circle to inf. An inset figure is used to define the width of the footing as B, the embedment depth as Df, and the thickness of the compressible layer measured from the embedment depth as H. The soil Poisson's ratio is v_u=0.5.\" width=\"1100\" height=\"928\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460.png 1100w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460-300x253.png 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460-1024x864.png 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460-768x648.png 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460-65x55.png 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460-225x190.png 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/4.17-replace-e1747992526460-350x295.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1100px) 100vw, 1100px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4112\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.17. Coefficients <em>\u03bc<sub>0<\/sub><\/em> and <em>\u03bc<\/em><sub>1<\/sub> for Poisson\u2019s ratio <em>v<\/em><sub>u<\/sub>=0.5 (after Christian and Carrier 1978).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"menu_order":5,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"","pb_short_title":"4.5 Immediate settlement of shallow foundations","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-241","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":215,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":242,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/241\/revisions\/242"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/215"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/241\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=241"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=241"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/fundamentalsoffoundationengineering\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}