{"id":76,"date":"2023-07-16T03:50:59","date_gmt":"2023-07-16T03:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/chapter\/indigenous_design_on_water_country\/"},"modified":"2026-03-16T13:46:31","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T13:46:31","slug":"indigenous_design_on_water_country","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/chapter\/indigenous_design_on_water_country\/","title":{"raw":"Indigenous design: Water Country","rendered":"Indigenous design: Water Country"},"content":{"raw":"This chapter introduces Indigenous design principles in the context of water and highlights their theoretical and practical applications. \u00a0I write this chapter as yinaa wiradyuri\/wiradyuri woman, water woman and engineering sceptic. \u00a0This chapter includes some activities to encourage you to engage with these ideas beyond this book. \u00a0An exercise to develop student\u2019s sense of country and Indigenous design principles is also included.\n\nAll design systems operate with an associated scientific system.\u00a0 The scientific system you are familiar with came with the colonisers and is referred to as settler-state science in this chapter.\u00a0 Human centred, this science tends to be exploitative and extractive, and marked by its reliance on western engineering and its use to change waterscapes (harriden, 2023).\u00a0 Settler-state science results in a transactional understanding of scientific priorities, practices and outputs.\u00a0 This brief characterisation of settler-science informs its relationship to water, with water regarded as transactional; a commodity to be used for human purposes and profit.\u00a0 By contrast, Indigenous sciences are country-centred, relational and adaptive (harriden, 2023), requiring the human be but one of many entities considered when practicing science and crafting designs.\u00a0 The relationality in Indigenous sciences strongly contributes to water being seen as having life and rivers regarded as kin which is the basic premise of this chapter.\n\nIndigenous design principles stand independent of settler-state principles and are best used as such, rather than attempt shoehorning them into settler-state design frameworks and paradigms.\u00a0 The principles presented in this chapter are high level and do not represent the specific design principles or knowledge of any particular Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander group.\u00a0 Indigenous design principles exemplify how all aspects of country are considered simultaneously, thus reflecting country\u2019s indivisibility and the relational interconnectedness of Indigenous sciences with other types of knowledge.\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Country<\/h3>\nCountry is an actor in Indigenous design, hence when using Indigenous design practice you are working with country.\u00a0 The importance of country cannot be overstated.\u00a0 Thus, it is necessary that when designing a technology or process that students have some understanding of country, its complexity and enduring significance to Indigenous peoples.\u00a0 Designing is working with country, including the materials used and the sites where they are accessed, the physical sites where designs are located or used, and sites where the manufacturing and construction occurs.\n\nCountry continues to guide Indigenous people practices and daily activities.\u00a0 Rather than empty rhetoric, the phrase \u2018caring for country\u2019 is a guiding ethos for Indigenous lives.\u00a0 County is more than soil, water, plants and animals; more than \u2018the environment\u2019.\u00a0 Certainly, these are part of country, but so too are the stars, sky, moon and sun, earth, wind, air, mountains and ancestors, songlines, dreaming, humans and language.\u00a0 How these, and other, entities relate to each other within in specific place\/space <em>is<\/em> country.\u00a0 Importantly, country is indivisible (Marshall, 2017).\u00a0 This means no one entity can be considered in isolation or attributed more importance than another.\u00a0 That is, the web of relationships between all aspects of country is the primary focus of research and design.\n\nAs well as indivisible, country is unique.\u00a0 No one country is the same as another, be it the waterscapes, landscapes, skyscapes or the animals and plants.\u00a0 Thus, there is an element of bounded territorially to the web of relationships forming country.\u00a0 Certainly, the ancestors, dreaming and songlines of each Indigenous Nation differs.\u00a0 These differences contribute to an imperative of country centred design \u2013 to design with country.\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\"><strong>Activity 1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Introduce yourself to water country<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nSpend some time every day for at least a week consciously, deliberately walking around a body of a water near you.\u00a0 If you can walk to this body of water, do so in a conscious and deliberate manner.\u00a0 Some tips:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Go at different times;<\/li>\n \t<li>walk in different directions;<\/li>\n \t<li>look up as well as around; and<\/li>\n \t<li>be quiet.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nWalking consciously and deliberately will help you start seeing some of the web of relationships that create country, including some of your relationships in that web.\u00a0 As you begin building your relationship with this body of water, you may find yourself greeting it upon arrival (country loves hearing our languages, so if you speak an Indigenous language, use it).\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Indigenous design principles<\/h3>\nWhen working with country and its people, the appropriate protocol is to work with the specific design principles and practices of that country and people. \u00a0Thus, while the broad high-level principles presented here are good for country and inform all Indigenous design practices, the appropriateness of a specific design will vary from country to country.\u00a0 Recognizing that country is indivisible, the water examples in this chapter are designed to support your recognition of Indigenous design principles as applied around waterscapes, rather than suggest they only be used for waterscape design requirements.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Country centred<\/h4>\nBeing country centred reflects the indivisibility of country, with all decisions, including design, putting country first.\u00a0 No one aspect of country, whether water, an eastern water dragon or soil, is regarded as more important than another, or managed separately.\u00a0 The consequences to country, as a complete unit, are considered and weighted appropriately in decision making and action taking.\u00a0 One aspect of country can not be \u2018sacrificed\u2019 for another.\n\nMost design projects crafted in the settler-state framework do not centre country.\u00a0 Indeed, they are often crafted in the face of country\u2019s complexity, focusing on one aspect of country.\u00a0 Consider the following example.\u00a0 Figure 1 shows a reach along Yarralumla Creek on Ngunnawal country in Canberra before a government initiated \u2018stream rehabilitation\u2019 project.\u00a0 This site is downstream of the storm water system to which the stream has been converted.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1381\"]<img class=\"wp-image-68 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1.jpg\" alt=\" From a reach in Yarralumla Creek, 30 Dec 2018\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1032\"> Figure 1 Heavily vegetated bank and shallow pool of water[\/caption]\n<p style=\"direction: ltr\">Figure 1 shows a heavily vegetated bank and shallow pool of water, indicating this reach to be less heavily modified than upstream.\u00a0 Hidden by the vegetation at the top left of the image is a natural riffle located immediately downstream of where the stream has a second (terminal) channel.\u00a0 Also unseen is the large raft of eastern water dragons flourishing in this section of the stream and the diversity of macroinvertebrates in the water plants.\u00a0 Despite this complexity and generally low levels of turbidity, the stream rehabilitation project was designed to manage solely turbidity (ACT Government, n.d.).\u00a0 This project specifically and consciously divided country.<\/p>\nFigure 2 shows the same reach upon completion of the so-called stream rehabilitation project. \u00a0By focussing only on reducing turbidity, it was considered appropriate to widen, straighten the channel and construct three large artificial riffles in the channel.\u00a0 This was clearly a human-centred design.\u00a0 Consequences included the extinction of the local water dragon population, the removal of banks and their associated vegetation.\u00a0 Outcomes such as these are not possible when centring country.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1381\"]<img class=\"wp-image-69 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2.jpg\" alt=\"SAME REACH AS IN FIG 1 FROM YARRALUMLA CREEK, 2 JUNE, 2019\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1032\"> Figure 2 after rehabilitation project. by K. Harriden, 30 December 2018.\u00a0 Used with permission of the photographer[\/caption]\n\nDesigning with country places the emphasis on using extant features in country to achieve design outcomes, rather than removing country to achieve design outcomes.\u00a0 Designing with country includes using on-country features to layout camps, for example trees as camp windbreaks or tended and mended as shade or water trees (Page &amp; Memmott, 2021).\u00a0 The use of lava flow formations for fish and eel traps at sites such as Budj Bim is another example of designing with country.\n\nSettler-state approaches to design sometimes feel like \u2018design despite country\u2019.\u00a0 Stormwater systems are an example of this approach.\u00a0 Despite country providing floodplains and a range of physical processes to accommodate high flow events, some humans have felt it appropriate to modify streams to support the rapid removal of the increased runoff created from a particular form of urban development.\u00a0 Contemporary urban water practitioners are gradually coming to understand that the design values and practices reflected in storm water system design are damaging urban waterscapes and leading to increased flooding.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Everything is animate<\/h4>\nIndigenous ways of being and valuing, including those of science and design, regard all entities in the web of relationships forming country as animate.\u00a0 This need to be remembered and respected. \u00a0Songlines, art and dance tell of times when mountains, trees or birds, for example, manifest in human form.\u00a0 Their animacy remains constant across the physical forms taken whether human or a more-than-human entity of country. \u00a0As will be outlined in the water specific design principles section, creeks, streams and rivers are animate and the water within them is regarded as having life.\n\nThe animacy recognized in non-human entities is an expression of the relationality that imbues Indigenous ways of being and valuing.\u00a0 Relationality is a central tenet of Indigenous worldviews, referring to the connection between all entities and reflecting the web of relationships that forms country.\u00a0 Relationality exists between ideas and entities, meaning that not only do Indigenous people see the world in terms of relationships but also \u201cfeel the world as kin\u201d (Tynan, 2021:4).\u00a0 The belief that every thing is alive and related strengthens the country-centred imperative, fundamentally altering what can be regarded as legitimate design choices and processes.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Functional sophistication<\/h4>\nA hallmark of Indigenous design is that an artefact may seem simple in both design and material, but is extraordinarily effective.\u00a0 For example, Page and Memmott (2022) highlight the woomera as an example of functional sophistication, as it can be used for hunting and carrying food gathered while hunting. \u00a0The boomerang is a better-known example of the functional sophistication of Indigenous design.\n\nThe leaky weirs designed in my research were to modify baseflow in open storm water channels.\u00a0 The weirs were simply lengths of untreated pine cut to a template roughly reflecting stream bed shape and attached with coach bolts in the expansion joints.\u00a0 Yet the changes in channel reach conditions, in terms of biodiversity and a range of physical and chemical processes for example, were significant.\u00a0 Figure 3 shows the channel flow before the leaky weirs are install; Figure 4 is after weir installation.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1381\"]<img class=\"wp-image-70 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3.jpg\" alt=\"PRE-WEIR INSTALLATION\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1032\"> Figure 3 Channel flow before the leaky weirs are install[\/caption]\n\nImmediately obvious from these images is the impact on flow morphology, as the flow slows and widens to pass around the weir.\u00a0 While hard to observe in Figure 4, this simple intervention traps sediment, which influences bed morphology and the retention of organic matter (Fig 5), allowing insects to thrive to the point that a mother duck brought ducklings upstream to forage in the resultant islands and accumulated sediment.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1035\"]<img class=\"wp-image-71 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4.jpg\" alt=\"post-weir installation\" width=\"1035\" height=\"1381\"> Figure 4 and 5. From Post-Weir Installation [Photograph], K. Harriden, n.d. Used with permission of the photographer.[\/caption]<img class=\"wp-image-72 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5.jpg\" alt=\"leaky weir - organic matter build up\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1035\">\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Embedded storytelling<\/h4>\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"2560\"]<img class=\"wp-image-772 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/DRONE-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Crocodile Design for hotel\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1917\"> Figure 6. From <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fo\/v32bpc1qnflg46wb51jzi\/AJbuqNgpsHboLlqlbLv-aWg?dl=0&amp;e=1&amp;preview=DRONE.jpg&amp;rlkey=ogn367w1hciuyl3wniqt6dsru\">Drone.jpg by D. Indigai [Photograph], 2024.<\/a> Used with permission of Dera Indigai<em style=\"font-family: 'Alegreya Sans', Amiri, sans-serif;font-size: 1.2em\">.<\/em>[\/caption]&nbsp;\n\nIn addition to functional sophistication, Indigenous design often embeds a narrative in artefacts.\u00a0 A contemporary example of this aspect of Indigenous design is found in the Gagudju Crocodile Hotel in Kakadu (Figure 6).\u00a0 The crocodile is an important totem animal of the local traditional custodians, the Gaagudju people.\u00a0 With every aspect of the building reflecting the crocodile, include carparks shaped and located to look like crocodile eggs from the air, only the most insular visitor does not immediately understand the significance of this animal to the Gaagudju people.\n\nEmbedding narratives in design allow Indigenous peoples to demonstrate their knowledge, connection to country and history.\u00a0 More than including Indigenous art or motifs, Indigenous narratives or story telling in design influences the function and feel of a place\/space.\u00a0 Embedded narratives also demonstrate the dynamic and continuing culture of Indigenous peoples beyond design.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Small scale, local materials and adaptive design<\/h4>\nIndigenous design prefers small scale design, be it stream interventions or toolmaking, reflecting the design requirement to centre country and fulfil relational obligations.\n\nThe use of local materials supports small scale design.\u00a0 Fibres are widely used, being possibly the most common material globally (Page &amp; Memmott, 2021).\u00a0 Not every place has an abundance of fibre.\u00a0 In places with an absence of grass fibres the locally abundant material, including rocks and tree fibres, are necessarily the preferred material.\u00a0 The reliance on local material encourages small scale design through the volume of material available at a place.\u00a0 That is, small scale artefacts require less material, reducing what is taken from country.\u00a0 If accessing materials from other places is not an option, or only small volumes of coveted materials can come from other places, small scale design is a practical way to ensure effective use of limited materials.\u00a0 There does appear a link between the size of an artefact and its capacity to be adapted, with larger artefacts, think bridges, dams or storm water systems for example, being less amenable to accommodating adaptive design features.\n\nAdaptive design reflects the need for trial and error to achieve appropriate and effective artefacts.\u00a0 More than ensuring high performance of an artefact, the capacity to adapt designs is critical to the long-term survival of any community given the imperative to respond to changes in environmental conditions and knowledge systems.\u00a0 The waterwheel, for example, continues to be used in some Indigenous communities across southeast Asia, despite engineering alternatives such as pumps, for their capacity to continuously supply water without any fuel source.\u00a0 As people became more experienced with waterwheels they identified that sealing the wheel allowed more water to be moved.\u00a0 More robust materials have also been used to enhance the design function of the waterwheel.\u00a0 Consequently, the adaptive design capacity in these communities has seen the waterwheel remain entrenched in many waterscapes, despite the engineering solutions now available.\n\nSmall scale design based on local materials supports the adaptive reuse of both materials and artefacts.\u00a0 Large structures are not as readily convertible as small structures as their individual components can be too large or weighty to manipulate and manoeuvre, and these components may not be able to be put to another use as readily as smaller components.\u00a0 Page &amp; Memmott (2021) provide evidence of structures that could be expanded or contracted in response to seasonal and other needs.\u00a0 That is, adaptive reuse is a design principle embedded in Indigenous practices, in contrast to its very recent inclusion in settler-state design principles.\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\" style=\"text-align: left\">\n<p class=\"textbox__header\"><strong>Activity\u00a0 2\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Identifying non-Indigenous design on water country<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nAs you walk water country, how may features in and around the waterscape that do not reflect Indigenous design principles can you identify?\n\nFor example, does the waterscape appear to have been modified with only human wants and needs in mind?\u00a0 Do the design features in water country have a sole purpose?\u00a0 Is the scale appropriate and material local?\u00a0 Can you see the story of water country?\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Indigenous design principles \u2013 water specific<\/h3>\nThis section introduces Indigenous design principles with specific relevance for water country.\u00a0 These principles compliment those just discussed and do not detract from the recognition of country as indivisible. \u00a0While the following design principles are specifically about water, they build on and work within those presented in the previous section.\n\nWater and streams are of such significance they require a specific design focus.\u00a0 For example, Gammage refers to templates, defined as \u201cplant communities deliberately associated, distributed, sometimes linked to natural features, and maintained for decades or centuries to prepare country for day-to-day working\u201d (2011:xix).\u00a0 Water, particularly in creeks, could be used as a template \u201canchor\u201d (Gammage, 2011:222), to extend water\u2019s availability across time and a range of environmental conditions.\u00a0 Templates are not about dividing country but supporting country\u2019s indivisibility.\u00a0 As such, templates represent designing with country.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Rivers as kin<\/h4>\nRelationality is the basis of recognising rivers as kin.\u00a0 Every entity enmeshed in the web of relationships forming individual countries is sentient. \u00a0Many entities are integral members in human kinship systems.\u00a0 Totemic relationships are an example of Indigenous kinship systems. \u00a0Rivers and water are entities widely regarded as kin.\u00a0 Wiradyuri people in southeast Australia describe themselves as fresh water people; the people of three rivers.\u00a0 One of these rivers is marrambidya (currently called the Murrumbidgee River).\u00a0 The wiradyuri translation of marrambidya is big\/good friend.\n\nThe Tlingit people in North America consciously cultivate a \u201cpowerful intimate and spiritual relationship\u201d (Hayman, James, Wedge &amp; Katzeek, 2017:222) with many more-than-human beings.\u00a0 Those who cultivate such a relationship with water learn deeply about it, and appreciating water as an individual.\u00a0 They also hold the obligation to identify and articulate things that may damge the relationship.\u00a0 The different ways of understanding water and rivers offered in these examples transforms the nature of design questions asked and solutions proposed.\u00a0 If you have cultivated, and are obliged to maintain, a deep relationship with water or see the river as your good friend, you simply cannot treat water or streams as sites for human-centred manipulation and extraction.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Don\u2019t build on floodplains<\/h4>\nFirst Nations people have been telling settler communities since their arrival to respect rivers by not building on their floodplains.\u00a0 While this principle may seem self-evident, if only to access the fertile farming soil of floodplains, it is about respect.\u00a0 Respect for the rivers, streams and creeks to express their sentience.\u00a0 This principle acknowledges the animacy of country, and that rivers and streams, as kin and country, have the right to flood and not be controlled.\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Nothing attached permanently to stream bed or banks<\/h4>\nThis principle supports the prohibition on building on floodplains.\u00a0 Prohibition of permanent design artefacts on beds or banks ensure the range of biological, chemical and physical processes in play in water country are not affected by human-centric design.\u00a0 For example, channel bank storage, an important process occurring in channel banks ameliorating in-channel event flow, has a critical role moving water between ground and surface sites and performs water treatment functions.\u00a0 Channel bank storage processes are extinguished when urban streams are converted to storm water channels with impervious armouring such as concrete.\u00a0 Importantly, leaving channel beds and banks free of permanent design features allows the stream to express the flow regime and course of its choice.\n\nPre-1788, there would have been many water interventions designs.\u00a0 For example, Gammage refers to a \u201cduck under\u201d (2011:26) which, from assembling logs and sheets of bark, was one of the designs allowing water to be temporarily (re)directed.\u00a0 In the 21st century, new designs using Indigenous science and design principles are required to manage the impact of setter-state science and design on waterways.\u00a0 My research incorporated installing artificial channel bank storage sites (Figure 7) in a creek converted to a storm water channel, to replace the event flow storage role of this process.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1381\"]<img class=\"wp-image-74 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7.jpg\" alt=\"ARTIFICIAL CHANNEL BANK STORAGE SITE, YARRALUMLA CREEK\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1035\"> Figure 7. From Artificial Channel Bank Storage Site, Yarralumla Creek [Photograph], K. Harriden, n.d. Used with permission of the photographer.[\/caption]\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Don\u2019t permanently change flow patterns or stream course<\/h4>\nTo permanently change stream course or flow patterns is regarded as disrespectful to water\u2019s rights as a sentient entity.\u00a0 Temporary modifications are acceptable, particularly when they extend water availability to food and drinking water sites such as wetlands.\n\nPermanent changes to stream course generate unintended consequences affecting the web of relationships that is country.\u00a0 Water remembers the path, and will try to follow it.\u00a0 The consequences can range from: the catastrophic failure of meters of stream banks and bed armouring of materials considered permanent, such as concrete or rocks being ripped up during a large event flow; to the trickle of subsurface flow through concrete armouring into channel flow (Figure 8).\n\n&nbsp;\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_75\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1381\"]<img class=\"wp-image-75 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8.jpg\" alt=\"Subsurface water flowing through concrete into Yarralumla Creek\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1035\"> Figure 8. From Subsurface water flowing through concrete into Yarralumla Creek [Photograph], K. Harriden, n.d. Used with permission of the photographer.[\/caption]&nbsp;\n\nIndigenous water country design principles are a stark contrast to those of settler-state design. \u00a0Each set of design principles reflects how water and rivers are understood in the respective design framework. \u00a0Vastly different waterscape outcomes are the consequence of these difference.\u00a0 For example, dams, channel diversion, storm water systems and other water management features of the settler-state design framework, including pumps and pipes built into stream banks and beds are problematic in terms of Indigenous design.\u00a0 Even when settler-state water designs seek to mimic nature, such as renaturalizing or daylighting streams, these projects are expensive and highly engineered, with the stream given a course to follow.\u00a0 Settler-state design principles do not regard streams as independent, kin related entities able to set and follow their own course.\n\nThis short section indicates how deeply waterscapes are influenced by design principles.\u00a0 The principles inherent in settler-state design tend to support highly controlled waterscapes reflecting human needs.\u00a0 By contrast, Indigenous design principles aspire to design for country, where human needs are not the highest priorities, water is regarded as alive and rivers as kin.\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\"><strong>Activity 3\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Identifying Indigenous design on water country<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nAs you walk water country, how many features in and around the waterscape reflecting Indigenous design principles can you identify?\n\nIn this case you are looking for designs that includes features such as having more than one purpose, use local materials and built at a scale that is reasonable and relevant.\u00a0 What water country designs can you identify that treat streams\/rivers as kin?\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Summary<\/h3>\nThe beliefs and values represented in the Indigenous water design principles are an extension of the general principles outlined early in the chapter, including centring country and relationality.\u00a0 Engaging with Indigenous design principles generates design problems and artefacts fundamentally different to those of settler-state design.\u00a0 These differences are the physical output of the fundamental philosophical difference between a transactional and relational understanding of the world.\u00a0 Using Indigenous principles supports crafting designs and artefacts that centre country and allow streams to run free. Thus, the decision a designer makes about which principles to use matters.\n\nDoing the three activities provided in this chapter will guide designers in critically applying design philosophies and practices in their work.\u00a0 Completing the following exercise is an opportunity to deepen and extend designers understandings of both Indigenous and settler-state design principles, and how each influences the waterscape.\u00a0 A short reference list is provided to support independent research.\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Final exercise<\/p>\n\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nThis exercise could be used as an assessment piece, or a way to bring together the three exercises in this chapter.\n\nReflecting on the different design approaches identified in the water country you walked in the previous activities, select an existing water storage system and assess it against the design principles presented in this chapter.\u00a0 What are some benefits of each design approach?\u00a0 What are some of the limits or problems associated with each design approach.\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nNote: All images provided by author and not licenced for reuse.\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n\n<strong>References<\/strong>\n\nACT Government. (n.d.). <em>Waterway restoration \u2013 Curtin (upper Molonglo Catchment).<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.environment.act.gov.au\/water\/ACT-Healthy-Waterways\/healthy-waterways\/sites\/waterway-restoration-curtin-upper-molonglo-catchment\">https:\/\/www.environment.act.gov.au\/water\/ACT-Healthy-Waterways\/healthy-waterways\/sites\/waterway-restoration-curtin-upper-molonglo-catchment<\/a>\n\nGammage, B. (2011). <em>The Biggest Estate on Earth.<\/em> Allen &amp; Unwin.\n\nHarriden, K. (2023). Working with Indigenous science(s) frameworks and methods: challenging the ontological hegemony of \u2018western\u2019 science and the axiological biases of its practitioners.<em> Methodological Innovations<\/em> <em>16<\/em>(2), 201\u2013214. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20597991231179394\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20597991231179394<\/a>\n\nHayman, E., James, C., Wedge, M. &amp; Katzeek, D. (2017). I y\u00e1.axch\u00b4age? (Can you hear it?), or H\u00e9en Aawashaayi Shaawat (marrying the water): A Tlingit and Tagish approach towards an ethical relationship with water. In. F. Ziegler &amp; D. Groenfeldt (Eds.), <em>Global water ethics: Towards a global ethics charter. <\/em>(1st ed., pp. 217-242). Taylor &amp; Francis Group. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315469690\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315469690<\/a>\n\nIndigai, D. (2024). <em>Drone.jpg <\/em>[Photograph]. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fo\/v32bpc1qnflg46wb51jzi\/AJbuqNgpsHboLlqlbLv-aWg?dl=0&amp;e=1&amp;preview=DRONE.jpg&amp;rlkey=ogn367w1hciuyl3wniqt6dsru\">https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fo\/v32bpc1qnflg46wb51jzi\/AJbuqNgpsHboLlqlbLv-aWg?dl=0&amp;e=1&amp;preview=DRONE.jpg&amp;rlkey=ogn367w1hciuyl3wniqt6dsru<\/a>.\n\nMarshall, V. (2017). <em>Overturning Aqua nullius: Securing Aboriginal water rights<\/em>. Aboriginal Studies Press.\n\nMemmott, P. &amp; Page, A. (2022) Materiality and design in Aboriginal engineering. In C. Kutay, E. Leigh, J. Prpic\u00a0 &amp; L. Ormond-Parker (Eds), <em>Indigenous engineering for an enduring culture<\/em> (pp. 319-348). Cambridge Scholars Publisher.\n\nPage, A., &amp; Memmott, P. (2021).\u00a0<i>Design\u202f: Building on Country<\/i>. Thames &amp; Hudson Australia.\n\nTynan, L. (2021). What is relationality?\u00a0 Indigenous knowledges, practices and responsibilities with kin. <i>Cultural Geographies<\/i>,\u00a0<i>28<\/i>(4), 597\u2013610. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14744740211029287\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14744740211029287\u00a0<\/a>\n\n<\/div>\n&nbsp;","rendered":"<p>This chapter introduces Indigenous design principles in the context of water and highlights their theoretical and practical applications. \u00a0I write this chapter as yinaa wiradyuri\/wiradyuri woman, water woman and engineering sceptic. \u00a0This chapter includes some activities to encourage you to engage with these ideas beyond this book. \u00a0An exercise to develop student\u2019s sense of country and Indigenous design principles is also included.<\/p>\n<p>All design systems operate with an associated scientific system.\u00a0 The scientific system you are familiar with came with the colonisers and is referred to as settler-state science in this chapter.\u00a0 Human centred, this science tends to be exploitative and extractive, and marked by its reliance on western engineering and its use to change waterscapes (harriden, 2023).\u00a0 Settler-state science results in a transactional understanding of scientific priorities, practices and outputs.\u00a0 This brief characterisation of settler-science informs its relationship to water, with water regarded as transactional; a commodity to be used for human purposes and profit.\u00a0 By contrast, Indigenous sciences are country-centred, relational and adaptive (harriden, 2023), requiring the human be but one of many entities considered when practicing science and crafting designs.\u00a0 The relationality in Indigenous sciences strongly contributes to water being seen as having life and rivers regarded as kin which is the basic premise of this chapter.<\/p>\n<p>Indigenous design principles stand independent of settler-state principles and are best used as such, rather than attempt shoehorning them into settler-state design frameworks and paradigms.\u00a0 The principles presented in this chapter are high level and do not represent the specific design principles or knowledge of any particular Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander group.\u00a0 Indigenous design principles exemplify how all aspects of country are considered simultaneously, thus reflecting country\u2019s indivisibility and the relational interconnectedness of Indigenous sciences with other types of knowledge.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Country<\/h3>\n<p>Country is an actor in Indigenous design, hence when using Indigenous design practice you are working with country.\u00a0 The importance of country cannot be overstated.\u00a0 Thus, it is necessary that when designing a technology or process that students have some understanding of country, its complexity and enduring significance to Indigenous peoples.\u00a0 Designing is working with country, including the materials used and the sites where they are accessed, the physical sites where designs are located or used, and sites where the manufacturing and construction occurs.<\/p>\n<p>Country continues to guide Indigenous people practices and daily activities.\u00a0 Rather than empty rhetoric, the phrase \u2018caring for country\u2019 is a guiding ethos for Indigenous lives.\u00a0 County is more than soil, water, plants and animals; more than \u2018the environment\u2019.\u00a0 Certainly, these are part of country, but so too are the stars, sky, moon and sun, earth, wind, air, mountains and ancestors, songlines, dreaming, humans and language.\u00a0 How these, and other, entities relate to each other within in specific place\/space <em>is<\/em> country.\u00a0 Importantly, country is indivisible (Marshall, 2017).\u00a0 This means no one entity can be considered in isolation or attributed more importance than another.\u00a0 That is, the web of relationships between all aspects of country is the primary focus of research and design.<\/p>\n<p>As well as indivisible, country is unique.\u00a0 No one country is the same as another, be it the waterscapes, landscapes, skyscapes or the animals and plants.\u00a0 Thus, there is an element of bounded territorially to the web of relationships forming country.\u00a0 Certainly, the ancestors, dreaming and songlines of each Indigenous Nation differs.\u00a0 These differences contribute to an imperative of country centred design \u2013 to design with country.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\"><strong>Activity 1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Introduce yourself to water country<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>Spend some time every day for at least a week consciously, deliberately walking around a body of a water near you.\u00a0 If you can walk to this body of water, do so in a conscious and deliberate manner.\u00a0 Some tips:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Go at different times;<\/li>\n<li>walk in different directions;<\/li>\n<li>look up as well as around; and<\/li>\n<li>be quiet.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Walking consciously and deliberately will help you start seeing some of the web of relationships that create country, including some of your relationships in that web.\u00a0 As you begin building your relationship with this body of water, you may find yourself greeting it upon arrival (country loves hearing our languages, so if you speak an Indigenous language, use it).<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Indigenous design principles<\/h3>\n<p>When working with country and its people, the appropriate protocol is to work with the specific design principles and practices of that country and people. \u00a0Thus, while the broad high-level principles presented here are good for country and inform all Indigenous design practices, the appropriateness of a specific design will vary from country to country.\u00a0 Recognizing that country is indivisible, the water examples in this chapter are designed to support your recognition of Indigenous design principles as applied around waterscapes, rather than suggest they only be used for waterscape design requirements.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Country centred<\/h4>\n<p>Being country centred reflects the indivisibility of country, with all decisions, including design, putting country first.\u00a0 No one aspect of country, whether water, an eastern water dragon or soil, is regarded as more important than another, or managed separately.\u00a0 The consequences to country, as a complete unit, are considered and weighted appropriately in decision making and action taking.\u00a0 One aspect of country can not be \u2018sacrificed\u2019 for another.<\/p>\n<p>Most design projects crafted in the settler-state framework do not centre country.\u00a0 Indeed, they are often crafted in the face of country\u2019s complexity, focusing on one aspect of country.\u00a0 Consider the following example.\u00a0 Figure 1 shows a reach along Yarralumla Creek on Ngunnawal country in Canberra before a government initiated \u2018stream rehabilitation\u2019 project.\u00a0 This site is downstream of the storm water system to which the stream has been converted.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 1381px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-68 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1.jpg\" alt=\"From a reach in Yarralumla Creek, 30 Dec 2018\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1032\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1.jpg 1381w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1-300x224.jpg 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1-1024x765.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1-768x574.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1-65x49.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1-225x168.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/11\/Figure-1-350x262.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1381px) 100vw, 1381px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1 Heavily vegetated bank and shallow pool of water<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"direction: ltr\">Figure 1 shows a heavily vegetated bank and shallow pool of water, indicating this reach to be less heavily modified than upstream.\u00a0 Hidden by the vegetation at the top left of the image is a natural riffle located immediately downstream of where the stream has a second (terminal) channel.\u00a0 Also unseen is the large raft of eastern water dragons flourishing in this section of the stream and the diversity of macroinvertebrates in the water plants.\u00a0 Despite this complexity and generally low levels of turbidity, the stream rehabilitation project was designed to manage solely turbidity (ACT Government, n.d.).\u00a0 This project specifically and consciously divided country.<\/p>\n<p>Figure 2 shows the same reach upon completion of the so-called stream rehabilitation project. \u00a0By focussing only on reducing turbidity, it was considered appropriate to widen, straighten the channel and construct three large artificial riffles in the channel.\u00a0 This was clearly a human-centred design.\u00a0 Consequences included the extinction of the local water dragon population, the removal of banks and their associated vegetation.\u00a0 Outcomes such as these are not possible when centring country.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 1381px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-69 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2.jpg\" alt=\"SAME REACH AS IN FIG 1 FROM YARRALUMLA CREEK, 2 JUNE, 2019\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1032\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2.jpg 1381w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2-300x224.jpg 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2-1024x765.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2-768x574.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2-65x49.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2-225x168.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-2-350x262.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1381px) 100vw, 1381px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2 after rehabilitation project. by K. Harriden, 30 December 2018.\u00a0 Used with permission of the photographer<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Designing with country places the emphasis on using extant features in country to achieve design outcomes, rather than removing country to achieve design outcomes.\u00a0 Designing with country includes using on-country features to layout camps, for example trees as camp windbreaks or tended and mended as shade or water trees (Page &amp; Memmott, 2021).\u00a0 The use of lava flow formations for fish and eel traps at sites such as Budj Bim is another example of designing with country.<\/p>\n<p>Settler-state approaches to design sometimes feel like \u2018design despite country\u2019.\u00a0 Stormwater systems are an example of this approach.\u00a0 Despite country providing floodplains and a range of physical processes to accommodate high flow events, some humans have felt it appropriate to modify streams to support the rapid removal of the increased runoff created from a particular form of urban development.\u00a0 Contemporary urban water practitioners are gradually coming to understand that the design values and practices reflected in storm water system design are damaging urban waterscapes and leading to increased flooding.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Everything is animate<\/h4>\n<p>Indigenous ways of being and valuing, including those of science and design, regard all entities in the web of relationships forming country as animate.\u00a0 This need to be remembered and respected. \u00a0Songlines, art and dance tell of times when mountains, trees or birds, for example, manifest in human form.\u00a0 Their animacy remains constant across the physical forms taken whether human or a more-than-human entity of country. \u00a0As will be outlined in the water specific design principles section, creeks, streams and rivers are animate and the water within them is regarded as having life.<\/p>\n<p>The animacy recognized in non-human entities is an expression of the relationality that imbues Indigenous ways of being and valuing.\u00a0 Relationality is a central tenet of Indigenous worldviews, referring to the connection between all entities and reflecting the web of relationships that forms country.\u00a0 Relationality exists between ideas and entities, meaning that not only do Indigenous people see the world in terms of relationships but also \u201cfeel the world as kin\u201d (Tynan, 2021:4).\u00a0 The belief that every thing is alive and related strengthens the country-centred imperative, fundamentally altering what can be regarded as legitimate design choices and processes.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Functional sophistication<\/h4>\n<p>A hallmark of Indigenous design is that an artefact may seem simple in both design and material, but is extraordinarily effective.\u00a0 For example, Page and Memmott (2022) highlight the woomera as an example of functional sophistication, as it can be used for hunting and carrying food gathered while hunting. \u00a0The boomerang is a better-known example of the functional sophistication of Indigenous design.<\/p>\n<p>The leaky weirs designed in my research were to modify baseflow in open storm water channels.\u00a0 The weirs were simply lengths of untreated pine cut to a template roughly reflecting stream bed shape and attached with coach bolts in the expansion joints.\u00a0 Yet the changes in channel reach conditions, in terms of biodiversity and a range of physical and chemical processes for example, were significant.\u00a0 Figure 3 shows the channel flow before the leaky weirs are install; Figure 4 is after weir installation.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 1381px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-70 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3.jpg\" alt=\"PRE-WEIR INSTALLATION\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1032\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3.jpg 1381w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3-300x224.jpg 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3-1024x765.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3-768x574.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3-65x49.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3-225x168.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-3-350x262.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1381px) 100vw, 1381px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 3 Channel flow before the leaky weirs are install<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Immediately obvious from these images is the impact on flow morphology, as the flow slows and widens to pass around the weir.\u00a0 While hard to observe in Figure 4, this simple intervention traps sediment, which influences bed morphology and the retention of organic matter (Fig 5), allowing insects to thrive to the point that a mother duck brought ducklings upstream to forage in the resultant islands and accumulated sediment.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 1035px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-71 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4.jpg\" alt=\"post-weir installation\" width=\"1035\" height=\"1381\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4.jpg 1035w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4-767x1024.jpg 767w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4-768x1025.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4-65x87.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-4-350x467.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1035px) 100vw, 1035px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4 and 5. From Post-Weir Installation [Photograph], K. Harriden, n.d. Used with permission of the photographer.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-72 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5.jpg\" alt=\"leaky weir - organic matter build up\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1035\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5.jpg 1381w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5-1024x767.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5-65x49.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5-225x169.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Picture-5-350x262.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1381px) 100vw, 1381px\" \/><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Embedded storytelling<\/h4>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 2560px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-772 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/DRONE-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Crocodile Design for hotel\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1917\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6. From <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fo\/v32bpc1qnflg46wb51jzi\/AJbuqNgpsHboLlqlbLv-aWg?dl=0&amp;e=1&amp;preview=DRONE.jpg&amp;rlkey=ogn367w1hciuyl3wniqt6dsru\">Drone.jpg by D. Indigai [Photograph], 2024.<\/a> Used with permission of Dera Indigai<em style=\"font-family: 'Alegreya Sans', Amiri, sans-serif;font-size: 1.2em\">.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In addition to functional sophistication, Indigenous design often embeds a narrative in artefacts.\u00a0 A contemporary example of this aspect of Indigenous design is found in the Gagudju Crocodile Hotel in Kakadu (Figure 6).\u00a0 The crocodile is an important totem animal of the local traditional custodians, the Gaagudju people.\u00a0 With every aspect of the building reflecting the crocodile, include carparks shaped and located to look like crocodile eggs from the air, only the most insular visitor does not immediately understand the significance of this animal to the Gaagudju people.<\/p>\n<p>Embedding narratives in design allow Indigenous peoples to demonstrate their knowledge, connection to country and history.\u00a0 More than including Indigenous art or motifs, Indigenous narratives or story telling in design influences the function and feel of a place\/space.\u00a0 Embedded narratives also demonstrate the dynamic and continuing culture of Indigenous peoples beyond design.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Small scale, local materials and adaptive design<\/h4>\n<p>Indigenous design prefers small scale design, be it stream interventions or toolmaking, reflecting the design requirement to centre country and fulfil relational obligations.<\/p>\n<p>The use of local materials supports small scale design.\u00a0 Fibres are widely used, being possibly the most common material globally (Page &amp; Memmott, 2021).\u00a0 Not every place has an abundance of fibre.\u00a0 In places with an absence of grass fibres the locally abundant material, including rocks and tree fibres, are necessarily the preferred material.\u00a0 The reliance on local material encourages small scale design through the volume of material available at a place.\u00a0 That is, small scale artefacts require less material, reducing what is taken from country.\u00a0 If accessing materials from other places is not an option, or only small volumes of coveted materials can come from other places, small scale design is a practical way to ensure effective use of limited materials.\u00a0 There does appear a link between the size of an artefact and its capacity to be adapted, with larger artefacts, think bridges, dams or storm water systems for example, being less amenable to accommodating adaptive design features.<\/p>\n<p>Adaptive design reflects the need for trial and error to achieve appropriate and effective artefacts.\u00a0 More than ensuring high performance of an artefact, the capacity to adapt designs is critical to the long-term survival of any community given the imperative to respond to changes in environmental conditions and knowledge systems.\u00a0 The waterwheel, for example, continues to be used in some Indigenous communities across southeast Asia, despite engineering alternatives such as pumps, for their capacity to continuously supply water without any fuel source.\u00a0 As people became more experienced with waterwheels they identified that sealing the wheel allowed more water to be moved.\u00a0 More robust materials have also been used to enhance the design function of the waterwheel.\u00a0 Consequently, the adaptive design capacity in these communities has seen the waterwheel remain entrenched in many waterscapes, despite the engineering solutions now available.<\/p>\n<p>Small scale design based on local materials supports the adaptive reuse of both materials and artefacts.\u00a0 Large structures are not as readily convertible as small structures as their individual components can be too large or weighty to manipulate and manoeuvre, and these components may not be able to be put to another use as readily as smaller components.\u00a0 Page &amp; Memmott (2021) provide evidence of structures that could be expanded or contracted in response to seasonal and other needs.\u00a0 That is, adaptive reuse is a design principle embedded in Indigenous practices, in contrast to its very recent inclusion in settler-state design principles.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\" style=\"text-align: left\">\n<p class=\"textbox__header\"><strong>Activity\u00a0 2\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Identifying non-Indigenous design on water country<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>As you walk water country, how may features in and around the waterscape that do not reflect Indigenous design principles can you identify?<\/p>\n<p>For example, does the waterscape appear to have been modified with only human wants and needs in mind?\u00a0 Do the design features in water country have a sole purpose?\u00a0 Is the scale appropriate and material local?\u00a0 Can you see the story of water country?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Indigenous design principles \u2013 water specific<\/h3>\n<p>This section introduces Indigenous design principles with specific relevance for water country.\u00a0 These principles compliment those just discussed and do not detract from the recognition of country as indivisible. \u00a0While the following design principles are specifically about water, they build on and work within those presented in the previous section.<\/p>\n<p>Water and streams are of such significance they require a specific design focus.\u00a0 For example, Gammage refers to templates, defined as \u201cplant communities deliberately associated, distributed, sometimes linked to natural features, and maintained for decades or centuries to prepare country for day-to-day working\u201d (2011:xix).\u00a0 Water, particularly in creeks, could be used as a template \u201canchor\u201d (Gammage, 2011:222), to extend water\u2019s availability across time and a range of environmental conditions.\u00a0 Templates are not about dividing country but supporting country\u2019s indivisibility.\u00a0 As such, templates represent designing with country.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Rivers as kin<\/h4>\n<p>Relationality is the basis of recognising rivers as kin.\u00a0 Every entity enmeshed in the web of relationships forming individual countries is sentient. \u00a0Many entities are integral members in human kinship systems.\u00a0 Totemic relationships are an example of Indigenous kinship systems. \u00a0Rivers and water are entities widely regarded as kin.\u00a0 Wiradyuri people in southeast Australia describe themselves as fresh water people; the people of three rivers.\u00a0 One of these rivers is marrambidya (currently called the Murrumbidgee River).\u00a0 The wiradyuri translation of marrambidya is big\/good friend.<\/p>\n<p>The Tlingit people in North America consciously cultivate a \u201cpowerful intimate and spiritual relationship\u201d (Hayman, James, Wedge &amp; Katzeek, 2017:222) with many more-than-human beings.\u00a0 Those who cultivate such a relationship with water learn deeply about it, and appreciating water as an individual.\u00a0 They also hold the obligation to identify and articulate things that may damge the relationship.\u00a0 The different ways of understanding water and rivers offered in these examples transforms the nature of design questions asked and solutions proposed.\u00a0 If you have cultivated, and are obliged to maintain, a deep relationship with water or see the river as your good friend, you simply cannot treat water or streams as sites for human-centred manipulation and extraction.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Don\u2019t build on floodplains<\/h4>\n<p>First Nations people have been telling settler communities since their arrival to respect rivers by not building on their floodplains.\u00a0 While this principle may seem self-evident, if only to access the fertile farming soil of floodplains, it is about respect.\u00a0 Respect for the rivers, streams and creeks to express their sentience.\u00a0 This principle acknowledges the animacy of country, and that rivers and streams, as kin and country, have the right to flood and not be controlled.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Nothing attached permanently to stream bed or banks<\/h4>\n<p>This principle supports the prohibition on building on floodplains.\u00a0 Prohibition of permanent design artefacts on beds or banks ensure the range of biological, chemical and physical processes in play in water country are not affected by human-centric design.\u00a0 For example, channel bank storage, an important process occurring in channel banks ameliorating in-channel event flow, has a critical role moving water between ground and surface sites and performs water treatment functions.\u00a0 Channel bank storage processes are extinguished when urban streams are converted to storm water channels with impervious armouring such as concrete.\u00a0 Importantly, leaving channel beds and banks free of permanent design features allows the stream to express the flow regime and course of its choice.<\/p>\n<p>Pre-1788, there would have been many water interventions designs.\u00a0 For example, Gammage refers to a \u201cduck under\u201d (2011:26) which, from assembling logs and sheets of bark, was one of the designs allowing water to be temporarily (re)directed.\u00a0 In the 21st century, new designs using Indigenous science and design principles are required to manage the impact of setter-state science and design on waterways.\u00a0 My research incorporated installing artificial channel bank storage sites (Figure 7) in a creek converted to a storm water channel, to replace the event flow storage role of this process.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 1381px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-74 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7.jpg\" alt=\"ARTIFICIAL CHANNEL BANK STORAGE SITE, YARRALUMLA CREEK\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1035\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7.jpg 1381w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7-1024x767.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7-65x49.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7-225x169.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-7-350x262.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1381px) 100vw, 1381px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7. From Artificial Channel Bank Storage Site, Yarralumla Creek [Photograph], K. Harriden, n.d. Used with permission of the photographer.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left\">Don\u2019t permanently change flow patterns or stream course<\/h4>\n<p>To permanently change stream course or flow patterns is regarded as disrespectful to water\u2019s rights as a sentient entity.\u00a0 Temporary modifications are acceptable, particularly when they extend water availability to food and drinking water sites such as wetlands.<\/p>\n<p>Permanent changes to stream course generate unintended consequences affecting the web of relationships that is country.\u00a0 Water remembers the path, and will try to follow it.\u00a0 The consequences can range from: the catastrophic failure of meters of stream banks and bed armouring of materials considered permanent, such as concrete or rocks being ripped up during a large event flow; to the trickle of subsurface flow through concrete armouring into channel flow (Figure 8).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75\" style=\"width: 1381px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-75 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8.jpg\" alt=\"Subsurface water flowing through concrete into Yarralumla Creek\" width=\"1381\" height=\"1035\" srcset=\"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8.jpg 1381w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8-1024x767.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8-65x49.jpg 65w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8-225x169.jpg 225w, https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2026\/03\/Figure-8-350x262.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1381px) 100vw, 1381px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8. From Subsurface water flowing through concrete into Yarralumla Creek [Photograph], K. Harriden, n.d. Used with permission of the photographer.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Indigenous water country design principles are a stark contrast to those of settler-state design. \u00a0Each set of design principles reflects how water and rivers are understood in the respective design framework. \u00a0Vastly different waterscape outcomes are the consequence of these difference.\u00a0 For example, dams, channel diversion, storm water systems and other water management features of the settler-state design framework, including pumps and pipes built into stream banks and beds are problematic in terms of Indigenous design.\u00a0 Even when settler-state water designs seek to mimic nature, such as renaturalizing or daylighting streams, these projects are expensive and highly engineered, with the stream given a course to follow.\u00a0 Settler-state design principles do not regard streams as independent, kin related entities able to set and follow their own course.<\/p>\n<p>This short section indicates how deeply waterscapes are influenced by design principles.\u00a0 The principles inherent in settler-state design tend to support highly controlled waterscapes reflecting human needs.\u00a0 By contrast, Indigenous design principles aspire to design for country, where human needs are not the highest priorities, water is regarded as alive and rivers as kin.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\"><strong>Activity 3\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Identifying Indigenous design on water country<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>As you walk water country, how many features in and around the waterscape reflecting Indigenous design principles can you identify?<\/p>\n<p>In this case you are looking for designs that includes features such as having more than one purpose, use local materials and built at a scale that is reasonable and relevant.\u00a0 What water country designs can you identify that treat streams\/rivers as kin?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Summary<\/h3>\n<p>The beliefs and values represented in the Indigenous water design principles are an extension of the general principles outlined early in the chapter, including centring country and relationality.\u00a0 Engaging with Indigenous design principles generates design problems and artefacts fundamentally different to those of settler-state design.\u00a0 These differences are the physical output of the fundamental philosophical difference between a transactional and relational understanding of the world.\u00a0 Using Indigenous principles supports crafting designs and artefacts that centre country and allow streams to run free. Thus, the decision a designer makes about which principles to use matters.<\/p>\n<p>Doing the three activities provided in this chapter will guide designers in critically applying design philosophies and practices in their work.\u00a0 Completing the following exercise is an opportunity to deepen and extend designers understandings of both Indigenous and settler-state design principles, and how each influences the waterscape.\u00a0 A short reference list is provided to support independent research.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Final exercise<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>This exercise could be used as an assessment piece, or a way to bring together the three exercises in this chapter.<\/p>\n<p>Reflecting on the different design approaches identified in the water country you walked in the previous activities, select an existing water storage system and assess it against the design principles presented in this chapter.\u00a0 What are some benefits of each design approach?\u00a0 What are some of the limits or problems associated with each design approach.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Note: All images provided by author and not licenced for reuse.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>ACT Government. (n.d.). <em>Waterway restoration \u2013 Curtin (upper Molonglo Catchment).<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.environment.act.gov.au\/water\/ACT-Healthy-Waterways\/healthy-waterways\/sites\/waterway-restoration-curtin-upper-molonglo-catchment\">https:\/\/www.environment.act.gov.au\/water\/ACT-Healthy-Waterways\/healthy-waterways\/sites\/waterway-restoration-curtin-upper-molonglo-catchment<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Gammage, B. (2011). <em>The Biggest Estate on Earth.<\/em> Allen &amp; Unwin.<\/p>\n<p>Harriden, K. (2023). Working with Indigenous science(s) frameworks and methods: challenging the ontological hegemony of \u2018western\u2019 science and the axiological biases of its practitioners.<em> Methodological Innovations<\/em> <em>16<\/em>(2), 201\u2013214. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20597991231179394\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20597991231179394<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Hayman, E., James, C., Wedge, M. &amp; Katzeek, D. (2017). I y\u00e1.axch\u00b4age? (Can you hear it?), or H\u00e9en Aawashaayi Shaawat (marrying the water): A Tlingit and Tagish approach towards an ethical relationship with water. In. F. Ziegler &amp; D. Groenfeldt (Eds.), <em>Global water ethics: Towards a global ethics charter. <\/em>(1st ed., pp. 217-242). Taylor &amp; Francis Group. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315469690\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315469690<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Indigai, D. (2024). <em>Drone.jpg <\/em>[Photograph]. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fo\/v32bpc1qnflg46wb51jzi\/AJbuqNgpsHboLlqlbLv-aWg?dl=0&amp;e=1&amp;preview=DRONE.jpg&amp;rlkey=ogn367w1hciuyl3wniqt6dsru\">https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fo\/v32bpc1qnflg46wb51jzi\/AJbuqNgpsHboLlqlbLv-aWg?dl=0&amp;e=1&amp;preview=DRONE.jpg&amp;rlkey=ogn367w1hciuyl3wniqt6dsru<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Marshall, V. (2017). <em>Overturning Aqua nullius: Securing Aboriginal water rights<\/em>. Aboriginal Studies Press.<\/p>\n<p>Memmott, P. &amp; Page, A. (2022) Materiality and design in Aboriginal engineering. In C. Kutay, E. Leigh, J. Prpic\u00a0 &amp; L. Ormond-Parker (Eds), <em>Indigenous engineering for an enduring culture<\/em> (pp. 319-348). Cambridge Scholars Publisher.<\/p>\n<p>Page, A., &amp; Memmott, P. (2021).\u00a0<i>Design\u202f: Building on Country<\/i>. Thames &amp; Hudson Australia.<\/p>\n<p>Tynan, L. (2021). What is relationality?\u00a0 Indigenous knowledges, practices and responsibilities with kin. <i>Cultural Geographies<\/i>,\u00a0<i>28<\/i>(4), 597\u2013610. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14744740211029287\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14744740211029287\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"menu_order":13,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["kateharriden"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[64],"license":[],"class_list":["post-76","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-kateharriden"],"part":47,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/76","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/76\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/76\/revisions\/77"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/47"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/76\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=76"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=76"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/libraryresources.nse.org.ng\/engineeringwithcountry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=76"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}